Published November 23, 2001 | Version v1
Journal article

Expense and benefit of neoadjuvant treatment in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

  • 1. Department of General and Trauma Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5 40225, Duesseldorf (Germany)
  • 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5 40225, Duesseldorf (Germany)
  • 3. Center of Pathology Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5 40225 Duesseldorf (Germany)
  • 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5 40225, Duesseldorf (Germany)

Description

The effectiveness of neoadjuvant treatment (NT) prior to resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) in terms of prolonged survival has not been proven by randomized trials. Facing considerable financial expenses and with concerns regarding the consumption of the patient's remaining survival time, this study aims to provide rationales for pretreating resection candidates. From March 1986 to March 1999, patients undergoing resection for SCCE were documented prospectively. Since 1989, NT was offered to patients with mainly upper and middle third T3 or T4 tumors or T2 N1 stage who were fit for esophagectomy. Until 1993, NT consisted of chemotherapy. Since that time chemoradiation has also been applied. The parameters for expense and benefit of NT are costs, pretreatment time required, postoperative morbidity and mortality, clinical and histopathological response, and actuarial survival. Two hundred and three patients were treated, 170 by surgery alone and 33 by NT + surgery. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 52% to 30% and 12% to 6%, respectively (p = n.s.). The response to NT was detected in 23 patients (70%). In 11 instances (33%), the primary tumor lesion was histopathologically eradicated. Survival following NT + surgery was significantly prolonged in node-positive patients with a median survival of 12 months to 19 months (p = 0.0193). The average pretreatment time was 113 ± 43 days, and reimbursement for NT to the hospital amounted to Euro 9.834. NT did not increase morbidity and mortality. Expenses for pretreatment, particularly time and costs, are considerable. However, taking into account that the results are derived from a non-randomized study, patients with regionally advanced tumor stages seem to benefit, as seen by their prolonged survival

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-1-20; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC61000

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
BMC cancer (Online)
Journal Volume
1
Journal Page Range
p. 20
ISSN
1471-2407

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46082143
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CARCINOMAS; CHEMOTHERAPY; COST RECOVERY; DISEASE INCIDENCE; ESOPHAGUS; HOSPITALS; MORTALITY; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; SURGERY; SURVIVAL TIME
Descriptors DEC
BODY; BUILDINGS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; ORGANS; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2001 Heise et al
Notes
PMCID: PMC61000; PUBLISHER-ID: 1471-2407-1-20; PMID: 11737874; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:61000; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.