Financing coal-fired power plant to demonstrate CCS (carbon capture and storage) through an innovative policy incentive in China
- 1. School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University, 010021, Inner Mongolia (China)
- 2. Center for Sustainable Development and Energy Policy Research (SDEP), School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing (CUMTB), Beijing, 100083 (China)
- 3. China School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JS (United Kingdom)
- 4. The Administrative Center for China's Agenda 21, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing, 100038 (China)
- 5. School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, 100083, Beijing (China)
- 6. Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University, ACT, 2601 (Australia)
Description
Highlights: • Extra electricity quota is proposed as an incentives mechanism for CCS project. • The NPV and LCOE are estimated under different electricity quotas. • Carbon trading can reduce the power generation cost to some extent. • The critical conditions are discussed in various scenarios. • The effects of changes in parameters are estimated through sensitivity analysis. Traditional policy incentives for carbon capture and storage (CCS) mainly rely on fiscal subsidies, which tend to put an inordinate strain on public finances. This study attempts to explore a non-fiscal incentive policy, granting a time extension (extra electricity quota), to finance early CCS demonstration projects in China. We find that coal-fired power plant (CFPP) operate at a loss even without CCS retrofitting under the current electricity quota (4000 h per year), while it can make profits with CCS retrofitting if extra electricity quotas are provided. Specifically, the electricity quota needs to be roughly 4709–7260 h per year with the CO2 capture level ranging from 0.1 to 1 Mt per year in the demonstration stage. In particular, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of CFPP with a capture level of 1 Mt per year is estimated at 298.8 CNY/MWh if the electricity quota reaches 7000 h per year, which is approximately equal to that of CFPP without CCS retrofitting and extra electricity quota (292.2 CNY/MWh). Thus, the extra electricity quota can be considered as an economically feasible policy incentive, and related results are able to provide useful information for electric power enterprises and government decision-makers.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112562Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112562;
- PII
- S0301421521004328;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 158
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54024059
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S20: FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COAL; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC POWER; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; FINANCING; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS; POWER GENERATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
- Descriptors DEC
- AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; CHALCOGENIDES; CONTROL; ECONOMICS; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; MATERIALS; NONMETALS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; POLLUTION CONTROL; POWER; POWER PLANTS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; THERMAL POWER PLANTS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.