Published July 10, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013

  • 1. Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka (Japan)
  • 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka (Japan)
  • 3. National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba (Japan)
  • 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka (Japan)

Description

This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From December 2014 to July 2017, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2013. Data were analyzed based on institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 216 000 and 257 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 862 452 cases with ~25.0% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 880), Gamma Knife (n = 45), 60Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and 192Ir RALS (n = 128). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 675 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 785 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 494. There were 831 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1130.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2214.6 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 196.6 FTE medical physicists, 183.8 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 856.7 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2013.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa047; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482164

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Radiation Research
Journal Volume
61
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 799-816
ISSN
0449-3060

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
Notes
PMCID: PMC7482164; PMID: 32648574; PUBLISHER-ID: rraa047; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:7482164
Collaborations
Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology Database Committee