Evaluating formulation and storage of Arthrobacter aurescens strain TC1 as a bioremediation tool for terbuthylazine contaminated soils: Efficacy on abatement of aquatic ecotoxicity
Creators
- 1. Department of Bioengineering, IST, UL, Av Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa (Portugal)
- 2. iBB—Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa (UL), Av Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa (Portugal)
- 3. CFE—Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra (Portugal)
Description
Recently, a bioremediation tool consisting of freshly grown cells of the Arthrobacter aurescens strain TC1 proved successful in the cleanup of terbuthylazine (TBA) contaminated soil, with potential to prevent TBA dispersal via the soil-water pathway. The present work aimed at examining the feasibility of preparing and formulating bioaugmentation bacterial cells in advance which retain adequate viability and herbicide-degrading activity during storage and transport to contaminated sites. Three different types of formulation of A. aurescens TC1 cells were performed, namely cell paste, lyophilized, and adsorbed onto the mineral carrier vermiculite. Vermiculite-based cell material and cell paste offered survival rates significantly higher (≥78% of cells recovered viable, when compared to the initial numbers) than lyophilized cells (≥65%) after storage at 4 °C for up to a maximum period of 30 days. Inocula prepared from the three types of formulated and stored cells supported adequate levels of herbicide-biodegradation activity, ultimately allowing an almost complete removal of TBA from either liquid buffer or soil. In soil microcosms, the efficacy of bioremediation of TBA-contaminated soil in terms of decontamination (%) based on the ecotoxicity assessment of soil eluates towards a freshwater microalga was found to differ within formulations in the order: lyophilized cells (~100% efficacy at the end of one or two weeks of bioremediation treatment with an initial inoculum of ~2.5 × 107 viable cells/g of soil; similar to fresh cells) > vermiculite-adsorbed cells (81% with ~2.4 × 108 cells/g) > cell paste (68% with ~2.4 × 108 cells/g). The limitations and advantages of each type of bacterial formulation, together with the prediction of their applicability in the field are discussed.
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.355;
- PII
- S0048969719308642;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 668
- Journal Page Range
- p. 714-722
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 55066746
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; DECONTAMINATION; FRESH WATER; HERBICIDES; MICROCOSMS; SOILS; VERMICULITE
- Descriptors DEC
- CHEMICAL REACTIONS; CLEANING; DECOMPOSITION; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; INORGANIC ION EXCHANGERS; ION EXCHANGE MATERIALS; MATERIALS; MICA; MINERALS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PESTICIDES; REMEDIAL ACTION; SILICATE MINERALS; WATER
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.