Global temperature, R&D expenditure, and growth
- 1. Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Via S. Faustino 74/B, 25122, Brescia (Italy)
- 2. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 9, II Building, LT 10222, Vilnius (Lithuania)
- 3. Directorate General Economics, Deutsche Bundesbank, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Goethe University Frankfurt, Wilhelm-Epstein-Straße 14, D-60431 Frankfurt am Main (Germany)
- 4. Department of Banking and Finance, Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Room 1013, Building 4, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ (United Kingdom)
Description
Highlights: • We use a VAR to quantify the effect of a temperature shock on R&D expenditure growth. • Temperature shifts negatively influence R&D expenditure growth in G7 countries. • We use a DSGE to evaluate three theoretical channels of the negative temperature effect. • Temperature risk generates welfare costs of 93.14% of lifetime utility in the DSGE model. • Government can offset welfare costs of temperature risk with subsidies or with taxes. We shed new light on the macroeconomic and financial effects of rising temperatures. In the data, a shock to global temperature dampens research and development (R&D) expenditure growth. This novel empirical evidence is rationalized within a stochastic endogenous growth model. In the model, temperature shocks undermine economic growth via a drop in R&D expenditure. We examine three theoretical channels of the negative R&D expenditure effect of rising temperatures: the patent obsolescence channel, the labor productivity channel, and the capital quality channel. Temperature risk generates welfare costs of 93.14% of lifetime utility in this benchmark model. Moreover, the government can offset these welfare costs by subsidizing investment with 7.04% or R&D expenditure with 3.81% of total public spending, respectively. Alternatively, it can levy a lump-sum tax on households which finances 6.90% of total public spending, reduce corporate taxes by 3.62 percentage points, or increase labor taxes by 2.80 percentage points.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105608Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105608;
- PII
- S0140988321004758;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Economics
- Journal Volume
- 104
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0140-9883
- CODEN
- EECODR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53107912
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AMBIENT TEMPERATURE; BENCHMARKS; CAPITAL; COST; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EXPENDITURES; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; HOUSEHOLDS; INVESTMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TAXES; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.