Published December 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Global temperature, R&D expenditure, and growth

  • 1. Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Via S. Faustino 74/B, 25122, Brescia (Italy)
  • 2. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 9, II Building, LT 10222, Vilnius (Lithuania)
  • 3. Directorate General Economics, Deutsche Bundesbank, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Goethe University Frankfurt, Wilhelm-Epstein-Straße 14, D-60431 Frankfurt am Main (Germany)
  • 4. Department of Banking and Finance, Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Room 1013, Building 4, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • We use a VAR to quantify the effect of a temperature shock on R&D expenditure growth. • Temperature shifts negatively influence R&D expenditure growth in G7 countries. • We use a DSGE to evaluate three theoretical channels of the negative temperature effect. • Temperature risk generates welfare costs of 93.14% of lifetime utility in the DSGE model. • Government can offset welfare costs of temperature risk with subsidies or with taxes. We shed new light on the macroeconomic and financial effects of rising temperatures. In the data, a shock to global temperature dampens research and development (R&D) expenditure growth. This novel empirical evidence is rationalized within a stochastic endogenous growth model. In the model, temperature shocks undermine economic growth via a drop in R&D expenditure. We examine three theoretical channels of the negative R&D expenditure effect of rising temperatures: the patent obsolescence channel, the labor productivity channel, and the capital quality channel. Temperature risk generates welfare costs of 93.14% of lifetime utility in this benchmark model. Moreover, the government can offset these welfare costs by subsidizing investment with 7.04% or R&D expenditure with 3.81% of total public spending, respectively. Alternatively, it can levy a lump-sum tax on households which finances 6.90% of total public spending, reduce corporate taxes by 3.62 percentage points, or increase labor taxes by 2.80 percentage points.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105608

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105608;
PII
S0140988321004758;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Economics
Journal Volume
104
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0140-9883
CODEN
EECODR

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53107912
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE; BENCHMARKS; CAPITAL; COST; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; EXPENDITURES; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; HOUSEHOLDS; INVESTMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TAXES; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.