Published July 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

FDG PET/MR for lymph node staging in head and neck cancer

  • 1. Dresden University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden (Germany)
  • 2. Dresden University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden (Germany)
  • 3. Dresden University Hospital, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden (Germany)
  • 4. Dresden University Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden (Germany)
  • 5. Dresden University Hospital, Department of Neuroradiology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden (Germany)
  • 6. Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstr. 400, 01328 Dresden (Germany)

Description

Objective: To assess the diagnostic value of PET/MR (positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) with FDG (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose) for lymph node staging in head and neck cancer. Materials and methods: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee; all patients signed informed consent. Thirty-eight patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region underwent a PET scan on a conventional scanner and a subsequent PET/MR on a whole-body hybrid system after a single intravenous injection of FDG. The accuracy of PET, MR and PET/MR for lymph node metastases were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Histology served as the reference standard. Results: Metastatic disease was confirmed in 16 (42.1%) of 38 patients and 38 (9.7%) of 391 dissected lymph node levels. There were no significant differences between PET/MR, MR and PET and MR (p > 0.05) regarding accuracy for cervical metastatic disease. Based on lymph node levels, sensitivity and specificity for metastatic involvement were 65.8% and 97.2% for MR, 86.8% and 97.0% for PET and 89.5% and 95.2% for PET/MR. Conclusions: In head and neck cancer, FDG PET/MR does not significantly improve accuracy for cervical lymph node metastases in comparison to MR or PET

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.023

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.023;
PII
S0720-048X(14)00161-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
83
Journal Issue
7
Journal Page Range
p. 1163-1168
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.