Published September 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Microbial community adaptability to altered temperature conditions determines the potential for process optimisation in biogas production

  • 1. Department of Molecular Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Box 7025, SE-750 07 Uppsala (Sweden)

Description

Highlights: • Changing from mesophilic to thermophilic AD and vice versa is feasible. • Thermophilic-to-mesophilic changes gave lower resistance to operative stress. • Increased loading rate showed potential for optimisation of biogas production. • The thermophilic community had low adaptability to mesophilic temperature condition. • Low resilience of key microbial populations was a possible cause of process failure. The operating temperature in anaerobic digestion strongly affects biogas yield, process stability and the potential for process optimisation. However, many questions remain on how to manage process operation for optimized microbial community adaptation following temperature changes. A long-term anaerobic digestion experiment was conducted to determine temperature-related issues in operative full-scale biogas plants and to evaluate optimisation potential and links to microbial community structure and responses. Four digesters fed household and slaughterhouse waste were operated in sets of two, at 37 °C or 52 °C, followed by a gradual increase or decrease in temperature in one digester in each set. Stability and flexibility of the digesters were then assessed by step-wise increases in organic loading rate (OLR) from 3 to 7 g VS/(L day), concurrently with decreased hydraulic retention time from 33–40 days to 14–17 days. Transition of operating temperature regime was possible, irrespective of starting temperature. However, slight temporary instability occurred at 42–44 °C and for the thermophilic to mesophilic process a period of adaptation was required to overcome this imbalance. The digesters with constant temperature and the mesophilic-to-thermophilic digester remained stable at the target OLR, demonstrating considerable optimisation potential for the large-scale biogas plants investigated. However, the digester that was changed from thermophilic to mesophilic conditions failed at 6 g VS/(L day). Comparisons of biological and chemical parameters suggested that this failure was caused by a lag in resilience of the acetate and propionate-degrading populations inherited from the community shaped by initial operation in thermophilic conditions. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the existing biogas plants are operating below capacity and that, depending on temperature, the annual energy production could be increased from 26–28 to 59–65 GWh through increasing OLR from 3 to 7 g VS/(L day). However, the results also highlight the importance of careful management and the risks when applying strategies not fully evaluated for the specific system. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate process performance, optimisation potential and microbial community adaptability to temperature changes in continuously fed anaerobic digesters under both increasing and decreasing operating temperature. The results could be used to guide operation management under temperature changes and increasing OLR in industrial-scale biogas processes.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.045

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.045;
PII
S0306261918309152;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
226
Journal Page Range
p. 838-848
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
52109145
Subject category
S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
Descriptors DEI
ACETATES; BIOGAS PROCESS; HYDRAULICS; LOADING RATE; MESOPHILIC CONDITIONS; METHANE; OPTIMIZATION; THERMOPHILIC CONDITIONS; WASTES
Descriptors DEC
ALKANES; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOCONVERSION; CARBOXYLIC ACID SALTS; DIGESTION; FLUID MECHANICS; HYDROCARBONS; MECHANICS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.