Published March 1, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

Role of Intra- or Periprostatic Calcifications in Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

  • 1. Department of Radiotherapy, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo (Brazil)

Description

Purpose: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) allows more precise localization of the prostate, thus minimizing errors resulting from organ motion and set-up during treatment of prostate cancer. Using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography (MVCBCT), references such as bones, the prostate itself or implanted fiducial markers can be used as surrogates to correct patient positioning immediately before each treatment fraction. However, the use of fiducials requires an invasive procedure and may increase costs. We aimed to assess whether intra- or periprostatic calcifications (IPC) could be used as natural fiducials. Methods and Materials: Data on patients treated with IGRT for prostate cancer with clearly visible IPC and implanted fiducials in both planning CT and MVCBCT images were reviewed. IPC were classified as central when inside the prostate and peripheral when within the planning target volume. Daily deviations in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions from baseline positioning using fiducials and using IPC were compared. Results: A total of 287 MVCBCT images were obtained and analyzed from 10 patients. The mean ± standard deviation daily deviation (mm) in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical coordinates were 0.55 ± 3.11, 0.58 ± 3.45, and −0.54 ± 4.03, respectively, for fiducials, and 0.72 ± 3.22, 0.63 ± 3.58, and −0.69 ± 4.26, for IPC. The p values for comparisons (fiducials vs. IPC) were 0.003, 0.653, and 0.078 for lateral, longitudinal, and vertical coordinates, respectively. When cases with central IPC were analyzed (n = 7), no significant difference was found in such comparisons. Central IPC and fiducials exhibited a similar pattern of displacement during treatment, with equal values for daily displacements in the three directions for more than 90% of measurements. Conclusions: Our data suggest that centrally located IPC may be used as natural fiducials for treatment positioning during IGRT for prostate cancer, with potential reductions in the risks and costs associated with fiducial implantation.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.059

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.059;
PII
S0360-3016(11)00540-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
82
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 1208-1216
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44016500
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; HAZARDS; IMAGES; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; PLANNING; PROSTATE; RADIOTHERAPY; SKELETON
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; GLANDS; MALE GENITALS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.