Published September 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Development of a genetic algorithm and its application to a bi-level problem of system cost optimal electricity price zone configurations

Creators

  • 1. House of Energy Markets and Finance, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 12, 45117 (Germany)

Description

Highlights: • Development of genetic algorithm to identify improved price zones. • Based on bi-level optimization problem of system cost optimal price zones. • Identified zones achieve significant cost and redispatch savings. • Hierarchical Algorithms based on LMPs are not the best choice. • Minimizing redispatch does not always correspond to minimizing system costs. The topic of alternative price zone configurations is frequently discussed in Central Western Europe where – so far – national borders coincide with borders of price zones. Reconfiguring these price zones is one option in order to improve congestion management, foster trading across borders of price zones and, thus, to increase welfare. In view of the significant increase in redispatch volumes and costs over the last years due to increasing feed-in from renewable energy sources in conjunction with delayed grid expansion, this topic has gained in importance. To determine these improved price zone configurations for a large-scale system like Central Western Europe, often either configurations based on expert guesses are considered or heuristics using approximate criteria like locational marginal prices are used to obtain price zones through clustering. In contrast, the present paper formulates a bi-level optimization problem of how to determine optimal configurations in terms of system costs and – given the size and nature of the problem – solves it with a specially developed genetic algorithm. Resulting price zone configurations are compared to both exogenously given, expert-based price zone configurations from the Entso-E bidding zone study and endogenously assessed configurations from a hierarchical cluster algorithm. Results show that the genetic algorithm achieves best results in terms of system costs. Moreover, the comparison with results from a hierarchical cluster analysis reveals important drawbacks of the latter methodology.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105422

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105422;
PII
S0140988321003169;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Economics
Journal Volume
101
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0140-9883
CODEN
EECODR

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53108148
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S97: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING;
Descriptors DEI
CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONFIGURATION; ELECTRICITY; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; PRICES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
Descriptors DEC
ALGORITHMS; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA PROCESSING; ENERGY SOURCES; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; PROCESSING

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.