Published June 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Sphagnum palustre clone vs native Pseudoscleropodium purum: A first trial in the field to validate the future of the moss bag technique

  • 1. Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Campus Monte S. Angelo, Via Cinthia 4, 80126 Naples (Italy)
  • 2. Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, 80055 Portici (Italy)
  • 3. Department of Functional Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela (Spain)
  • 4. Department of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment, University of Siena, Via P.A. Mattioli 4, 53100 Siena (Italy)
  • 5. Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of A Coruña, 15071 A Coruña (Spain)
  • 6. BIOSS – Centre for Biological Signalling Research, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestr. 18, 79104 Freiburg (Germany)
  • 7. Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestraße 1, 79104 Freiburg (Germany)
  • 8. Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri 10, 34127 Trieste (Italy)

Description

Although a large body of literature exists on the use of transplanted mosses for biomonitoring of air pollution, no article has addressed so far the use and the accumulation performance of a cloned moss for this purpose. In this work, a direct comparison of metal accumulation between bags filled with a Sphagnum palustre L. clone or with native Pseudoscleropodium purum Hedw., one of the most used moss species in biomonitoring surveys, was investigated. The test was performed in sites with different atmospheric contamination levels selected in urban, industrial, agricultural and background areas of Italy and Spain. Among the eighteen elements investigated, S. palustre was significantly enriched in 10 elements (Al, Ba, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Pb, Sr, V and Zn), while P. purum was enriched only in 6 elements (Al, Ba, Cu, Hg, Pb and Sr), and had a consistently lower uptake capacity than S. palustre. The clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake and showed a better performance as a bioaccumulator, providing a higher accumulation signal and allowing a finer distinction among the different land uses and levels of pollution. The excellent uptake performance of the S. palustre clone compared to the native P. purum and its low and stable baseline elemental content, evidenced in this work, are key features for the improvement of the moss bag approach and its large scale application. - Highlights: • Metal accumulation was compared between a S. palustre clone and native P. purum. • The S. palustre clone proved to be more sensitive in terms of metal uptake. • The S. palustre clone showed a higher accumulation signal compared to P. purum. • S. palustre allowed a finer distinction among the different levels of pollution. • The higher sensitivity of the clone facilitates its use in low impacted environments. - S. palustre clone shows better uptake ability in terms of accumulation signal and distinction among pollution levels compared to P. purum.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.057

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.057;
PII
S0269-7491(16)32480-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Pollution (1987)
Journal Volume
225
Journal Page Range
p. 323-328
ISSN
0269-7491
CODEN
ENPOEK

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49057086
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; BUILDUP; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ITALY; LAND USE; MOSSES; PERFORMANCE; POLLUTANTS; SENSITIVITY; SIGNALS; SPAIN; UPTAKE
Descriptors DEC
BRYOPHYTA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; EUROPE; EVALUATION; PLANTS; POLLUTION; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.