Published September 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Technologies for the management of MSW incineration ashes from gas cleaning: New perspectives on recovery of secondary raw materials and circular economy

  • 1. CIEPQPF - Research Centre on Chemical Processes Engineering and Forest Products, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, Rua Silvio Lima, Polo II, 3030-790 Coimbra (Portugal)
  • 2. INSTM and Chemistry for Technologies Laboratory, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia (Italy)
  • 3. Centre for Resource Efficiency & the Environment (CREE), Department of Civil, Environmental & Geomatic Engineering (CEGE), University College London - UCL, Chadwick Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT (United Kingdom)
  • 4. Development Center for Sustainable Management of Recyclable Waste and Resources (ZAR), Wildbachstrasse 2, 8340 Hinwil (Switzerland)
  • 5. Dipartimento di Scienze Biologiche, Geologiche e Ambientali, Università di Bologna, Piazza di Porta San Donato 1, 40126 Bologna (Italy)
  • 6. Danish Waste Solutions ApS, Agern Allé 3, DK-2970 Hørsholm (Denmark)
  • 7. Stena Recycling AS, Banemarksvej 40, DK-2605 Brøndby (Denmark)
  • 8. TU Wien, Christian-Doppler-Laboratory for Anthropogenic Resources, Karlsplatz 13/226, 1040 Vienna (Austria)

Description

Highlights: • Overview of the technologies for the management of APCr/FA from incineration is given. • Six routes for resource recovery to substitute raw materials or products were detailed. • The main resource recovered were minerals for building industry, metals, and deicing salts. • Waste, incineration and APC technologies determine resource contents in APCr/FA. • Natural resource evaluation can be used to assess resource recovery options of APCr/FA. Environmental policies in the European Union focus on the prevention of hazardous waste and aim to mitigate its impact on human health and ecosystems. However, progress is promoting a shift in perspective from environmental impacts to resource recovery. Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) has been increasing in developed countries, thus the amount of air pollution control residues (APCr) and fly ashes (FA) have followed the same upward trend. APCr from MSWI is classified as hazardous waste in the List of Waste (LoW) and as an absolute entry (19 01 07*), but FA may be classified as a mirror entry (19 0 13*/19 01 14). These properties arise mainly from their content in soluble salts, potentially toxic metals, trace organic pollutants and high pH in contact with water. Since these residues have been mostly disposed of in underground and landfills, other possibilities must be investigated to recover secondary raw materials and products. According to the literature, four additional routes of recovery have been found: detoxification (e.g. washing), product manufacturing (e.g. ceramic products and cement), practical applications (e.g. CO2 sequestration) and recovery of materials (e.g. Zn and salts). This work aims to identify the best available technologies for material recovery in order to avoid landfill solutions. Within this scope, six case studies are presented and discussed: recycling in lightweight aggregates, glass-ceramics, cement, recovery of zinc, rare metals and salts. Finally, future perspectives are provided to advance understanding of this anthropogenic waste as a source of resources, yet tied to safeguards for the environment.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.150

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.150;
PII
S0048969718313202;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
635
Journal Page Range
p. 526-542
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.