Published November 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Follow-up of CT-derived airway wall thickness: Correcting for changes in inspiration level improves reliability

  • 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (Netherlands)
  • 2. Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (Netherlands)
  • 3. Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (Netherlands)
  • 4. Institute for Medical Image Computing, Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen (Germany)
  • 5. Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
  • 6. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Department of Radiology (Netherlands)
  • 7. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen (Netherlands)

Description

Objectives: Airway wall thickness (AWT) is affected by changes in lung volume. This study evaluated whether correcting AWT on computed tomography (CT) for differences in inspiration level improves measurement agreement, reliability, and power to detect changes over time. Methods: Participants of the Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening trial who underwent 3-month repeat CT for an indeterminate pulmonary nodule were included. AWT on CT was calculated by the square root of the wall area at a theoretical airway with an internal perimeter of 10 mm (Pi10). The scan with the highest lung volume was labelled as the reference scan and the scan with the lowest lung volume was labelled as the comparison scan. Pi10 derived from the comparison scan was corrected by multiplying it with the ratio of CT lung volume of the comparison scan to CT lung volume on the reference scan. Agreement of uncorrected and corrected Pi10 was studied with the Bland-Altman method, reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and power to detect changes over time was calculated. Results: 315 male participants were included. Limit of agreement and reliability for Pi10 was −0.61 to 0.57 mm (ICC = 0.87), which improved to −0.38 to 0.37 mm (ICC = 0.94) after correction for inspiration level. To detect a 15% change over 3 months, 71 subjects are needed for Pi10 and 26 subjects for Pi10 adjusted for inspiration level. Conclusions: Correcting Pi10 for differences in inspiration level improves reliability, agreement, and power to detect changes over time.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.009

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.009;
PII
S0720-048X(16)30278-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
85
Journal Issue
11
Journal Page Range
p. 2008-2013
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49006155
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; LUNGS; RELIABILITY; THICKNESS
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIMENSIONS; ORGANS; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.