Follow-up of CT-derived airway wall thickness: Correcting for changes in inspiration level improves reliability
Creators
- 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (Netherlands)
- 2. Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen (Netherlands)
- 3. Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (Netherlands)
- 4. Institute for Medical Image Computing, Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen (Germany)
- 5. Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
- 6. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Department of Radiology (Netherlands)
- 7. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen (Netherlands)
Description
Objectives: Airway wall thickness (AWT) is affected by changes in lung volume. This study evaluated whether correcting AWT on computed tomography (CT) for differences in inspiration level improves measurement agreement, reliability, and power to detect changes over time. Methods: Participants of the Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening trial who underwent 3-month repeat CT for an indeterminate pulmonary nodule were included. AWT on CT was calculated by the square root of the wall area at a theoretical airway with an internal perimeter of 10 mm (Pi10). The scan with the highest lung volume was labelled as the reference scan and the scan with the lowest lung volume was labelled as the comparison scan. Pi10 derived from the comparison scan was corrected by multiplying it with the ratio of CT lung volume of the comparison scan to CT lung volume on the reference scan. Agreement of uncorrected and corrected Pi10 was studied with the Bland-Altman method, reliability with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and power to detect changes over time was calculated. Results: 315 male participants were included. Limit of agreement and reliability for Pi10 was −0.61 to 0.57 mm (ICC = 0.87), which improved to −0.38 to 0.37 mm (ICC = 0.94) after correction for inspiration level. To detect a 15% change over 3 months, 71 subjects are needed for Pi10 and 26 subjects for Pi10 adjusted for inspiration level. Conclusions: Correcting Pi10 for differences in inspiration level improves reliability, agreement, and power to detect changes over time.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.009Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.009;
- PII
- S0720-048X(16)30278-9;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Journal of Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 85
- Journal Issue
- 11
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2008-2013
- ISSN
- 0720-048X
- CODEN
- EJRADR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49006155
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; LUNGS; RELIABILITY; THICKNESS
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIMENSIONS; ORGANS; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.