There is a newer version of the record available.

Published 2023 | Version v1
Journal article

Development and multicenter validation of a multiparametric imaging model to predict treatment response in rectal cancer

  • 1. GROW School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht (Netherlands)
  • 2. Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 5. Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 6. Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht (Netherlands)
  • 7. Department of Radiology, Deventer Ziekenhuis, Schalkhaar (Netherlands)
  • 8. Department of Interventional Radiology, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg (Netherlands)
  • 9. Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch (Netherlands)
  • 10. Department of Radiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar (Netherlands)
  • 11. Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp (Netherlands)
  • 12. Department of Radiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem (Netherlands)
  • 13. Department of Radiology, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel (Netherlands)
  • 14. Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen (Netherlands)
  • 15. Department of Radiology, Acad. F. Todua Medical Center, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tbilisi (Georgia)
  • 16. Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
  • 17. Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle (Denmark)

Description

To develop and validate a multiparametric model to predict neoadjuvant treatment response in rectal cancer at baseline using a heterogeneous multicenter MRI dataset. Baseline staging MRIs (T2W (T2-weighted)-MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) / apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)) of 509 patients (9 centres) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were collected. Response was defined as (1) complete versus incomplete response, or (2) good (Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) 1-2) versus poor response (TRG3-5). Prediction models were developed using combinations of the following variable groups: (1) Non-imaging: age/sex/tumor-location/tumor-morphology/CRT-surgery interval (2) Basic staging: cT-stage/cN-stage/mesorectal fascia involvement, derived from (2a) original staging reports, or (2b) expert re-evaluation (3) Advanced staging: variables from 2b combined with cTN-substaging/invasion depth/extramural vascular invasion/tumor length (4) Quantitative imaging: tumour volume + first-order histogram features (from T2W-MRI and DWI/ADC) Models were developed with data from 6 centers (n = 412) using logistic regression with the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operator (LASSO) feature selection, internally validated using repeated (n = 100) random hold-out validation, and externally validated using data from 3 centers (n = 97). After external validation, the best model (including non-imaging and advanced staging variables) achieved an area under the curve of 0.60 (95%CI=0.48-0.72) to predict complete response and 0.65 (95%CI=0.53-0.76) to predict a good response. Quantitative variables did not improve model performance. Basic staging variables consistently achieved lower performance compared to advanced staging variables. Overall model performance was moderate. Best results were obtained using advanced staging variables, highlighting the importance of good-quality staging according to current guidelines. Quantitative imaging features had no added value (in this heterogeneous dataset). Predicting tumour response at baseline could aid in tailoring neoadjuvant therapies for rectal cancer. This study shows that image-based prediction models are promising, though are negatively affected by variations in staging quality and MRI acquisition, urging the need for harmonization.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology (Internet)
Journal Volume
33
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 8889-8898
ISSN
1432-1084
CODEN
EURAE3