Introduction of an alternative standardized radiographic measurement method to evaluate volar angulation in subcapital fractures of the 5th metacarpal
Creators
- 1. University of Salzburg, Department of Traumatology and Sports Injuries, Salzburg (Austria)
- 2. University of Salzburg, Department of Radiology, Salzburg (Austria)
- 3. University of Salzburg, Department of Organismic Biology, Salzburg (Austria)
- 4. Shoulder and Elbow Surgery ATOS Clinic Munich, Munich (Germany)
Description
The purpose of the present study was to compare the intra- and interobserver reliability of two different measurement methods for volar angulation of the 5th metacarpal (MC) in an attempt to establish a new standard measurement method to reduce interobserver discrepancies for therapeutic decisions. Twenty patients with subcapital fractures of the 5th MC were radiologically investigated. Imaging consisted of a radiographs in antero-posterior and precise lateral view in addition to a CT scan of the 5th MC. Measurement of volar angulation was accomplished using the conventional and the shaft articular surface (SAS) method. The measurements of five investigators were exported to a spreadsheet for statistical analysis to evaluate the intra-and interobserver reliability. The conventional technique showed large differences among the investigators and poor interobserver reliability (W = 0.328 and 0.307) both at injury (p = 0.001) and at follow-up (p = 0.189). The intraobserver concordance of all investigators showed better results with the SAS than with the conventional technique. With the SAS technique, no statistically significant difference among the investigators could be detected at either the time of injury (p = 0.418) or at follow-up (p = 0.526) with excellent interobserver reliability (W = 0.051 and W = 0.041). Evaluation of volar angulation at follow-up using CT scans did not show any statistically significant difference between the techniques with better correlation among the observers with the SAS technique (p = 0.838). The interobserver correlation of volar angulation with lateral radiographs using the conventional technique was insufficient. Therefore, we recommend the use of the novel SAS technique as standardized measurement method which showed higher accuracy and interobserver reliability in order to facilitate the choice of adequate treatment option. (orig.)
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1436-zAdditional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Skeletal Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 41
- Journal Issue
- 10
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1239-1244
- ISSN
- 0364-2348
- CODEN
- SKRADI
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 44000150
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; BONE FRACTURES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSIS; FINGERS; INJURIES; RELIABILITY; STANDARDIZATION; THERAPY; X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY
- Descriptors DEC
- ARMS; BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EVALUATION; HANDS; INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY; INJURIES; LIMBS; MATERIALS TESTING; MEDICINE; NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; TESTING; TOMOGRAPHY