Adapting to climate change in small-scale fisheries: Insights from indigenous communities in the global north and south
- 1. Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal (Canada)
- 2. Priestley International Centre for Climate, University of Leeds, Leeds (United Kingdom)
- 3. The Bieler School of Environment, McGill University, Montreal (Canada)
- 4. Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montreal (Canada)
- 5. Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg (Canada)
Description
Highlights: • Compare two climate-sensitive Indigenous fisheries to generate broader insights. • Notice distinct changes but similar adaptive responses across case studies. • Diversification and adaptive co-management are common adaptive strategies. • Offer eight community resilience-building tactics (i.e., sources of resilience). • Named five definitive traits of a successful adaptation process. Climate change is having a significant influence on global fish production as well as on small-scale fishers' livelihoods, nutrition, and food security. We compared two climate-sensitive small-scale fisheries (SSFs) – an Inuit community in the Canadian Arctic and the Coastal-Vedda in Sri Lanka – to broaden our understanding of how fisheries-dependent Indigenous communities respond and adapt to climate change impacts. We used three steps to achieve this comparative study. To do this, we developed a resilience-based conceptual framework to empirically assess adaptations in two SSF communities, based on a literature review. Using the proposed framework and collecting qualitative field data over three years (2016–2019) to investigate how different remote SSFs experience and respond to climate change, we assessed Inuit and Coastal-Vedda case studies. The framework provided the structure for data analysis and conceptual guidance for two empirical assessments and the comparative analysis. Finally, we carried out the comparative analysis across the case studies using content analysis, identifying adaptive strategies, sources of resilience, and characteristics of successful adaptation. Additionally, we used discourse analysis to develop sources of resilience and characteristics of successful adaptation. Two key adaptive strategies emerged in common across the two communities – diversification and adaptive co-management. Eight sources of resilience that underpin adaptive capacity: i) use of diverse kinds of knowledge; ii) practice of different ways of learning; iii) use of community-based institutions; iv) efforts to improve human agency; v) unique worldviews; vi) specific cultural attributes that keep up with adaptation; vii) effective social networks; and viii) a high level of flexibility. Definitive characteristics that need to promote successful community adaptation: continuous learning through knowledge co-production; capacity-building to improve human agency; a place-specific nature (rootedness); collective action and partnerships through community-based institutions; and flexibility.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.009Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.11.009;
- PII
- S1462901120313976;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Environmental Science and Policy
- Journal Volume
- 116
- Journal Page Range
- p. 160-170
- ISSN
- 1462-9011
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54001055
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CLIMATES; CLIMATIC CHANGE; DATA ANALYSIS; DIVERSIFICATION; FISHERIES; FLEXIBILITY; FOOD; INUIT; LEARNING; NUTRITION; REVIEWS
- Descriptors DEC
- DATA PROCESSING; DOCUMENT TYPES; HUMAN POPULATIONS; INDIGENOUS PEOPLES; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; POPULATIONS; PROCESSING; TENSILE PROPERTIES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.