Published April 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison of different stomatal conductance algorithms for ozone flux modelling

  • 1. Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York, York, North Yorkshire YO 10 5DD (United Kingdom)
  • 2. Alterra, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB Wageningen (Netherlands)
  • 3. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO (United States)
  • 4. Institute of Agronomy and Crop Science, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Ludwig-Wucherer-Strass 2, D-06099 Halle (Germany)
  • 5. N and T Services, 6736 Flagler Road, Fort Collins, CO 80525 (United States)
  • 6. Forest Ecosystems and Ecological Risk, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zuercherstrass 111, 8903 Birmensdorf ZH (Switzerland)
  • 7. Department of Biology, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 111, 80101 Joensuu (Finland)
  • 8. Institute for Energetics, Environment and Technological Research (CIEMAT), Avda. Complutense, 22, 28040, Madrid (Spain)

Description

A multiplicative and a semi-mechanistic, BWB-type [Ball, J.T., Woodrow, I.E., Berry, J.A., 1987. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Biggens, J. (Ed.), Progress in Photosynthesis Research, vol. IV. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 221-224.] algorithm for calculating stomatal conductance (g s) at the leaf level have been parameterised for two crop and two tree species to test their use in regional scale ozone deposition modelling. The algorithms were tested against measured, site-specific data for durum wheat, grapevine, beech and birch of different European provenances. A direct comparison of both algorithms showed a similar performance in predicting hourly means and daily time-courses of g s, whereas the multiplicative algorithm outperformed the BWB-type algorithm in modelling seasonal time-courses due to the inclusion of a phenology function. The re-parameterisation of the algorithms for local conditions in order to validate ozone deposition modelling on a European scale reveals the higher input requirements of the BWB-type algorithm as compared to the multiplicative algorithm because of the need of the former to model net photosynthesis (A n). - A comparison of an empirical and a semi-mechanistic stomatal conductance algorithm for European crop and forest species reveals a similar predictive capability

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envpol.2006.04.007;
PII
S0269-7491(06)00276-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Pollution (1987)
Journal Volume
146
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 726-735
ISSN
0269-7491
CODEN
ENPOEK

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
39002603
Subject category
S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; BERRIES; BIRCHES; CROPS; FORESTS; LEAVES; OZONE; PERFORMANCE; PHENOLOGY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SIMULATION; WHEAT
Descriptors DEC
CEREALS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; FOOD; FRUITS; GRAMINEAE; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MAGNOLIOPSIDA; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS; PLANTS; SYNTHESIS; TREES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.