Discovery of the truth against credo. Greenhouse hypothesis cannot escape falsification

In this issue of Spil (pp 30-33) Vellinga, van Dorland and Kabat respond to the criticism on prevailing climate research expressed in this magazine. The authors of this article are the main addressees, but they feel that their statements are not effectively contradicted. In his critical comments, Vellinga focuses once more on the AGW hypothesis (anthropogenic global warming), the human greenhouse gas hypothesis. This theory explains current climate changes as results of AGW. The announcement of this hypothesis has held the characteristics of credo for a long time already, being propagated with a small catechism of questions and answers. The questions that are used as starting point are selected based on the desirability of their answers according to the authors of this article. [mk]