Published 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Towards proposition of a diagnostic reference level for mammographic examination in the greater Khorasan province, Iran

  • 1. Medical Physics Research Center, Bu-Ali Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 2. Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 3. Radiologic Technology Department, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad (Iran, Islamic Republic of)

Description

Although, over the past few years, the application of mammography has risen up sharply in Iran, very little, if any, has been reported of the extent of patient's dose from this type of imaging. The purpose of this study was to establish local diagnostic reference level (DRL) arising from mammography in the great Khorasan province of Iran. It is generally assumed that the glandular tissue is the most vulnerable type of breast tissue. Therefore, the mean glandular dose (MGD) has been widely accepted as the most appropriate dosimetric quantity to predict the risk of radiation-induced cancer. Literary, DRL for mammography is defined as the 75. percentile of MGD distribution. In Khorasan province, 7 out of 40 centres were randomly selected. In this work, 100 patients were studied. Thermoluminescence dosimeters have been used to measure entrance surface doses (ESDs). Since, it is difficult to directly measure MGD, Monte Carlo model-based conversion factors were utilised to conclude MGD from ESD. The results have revealed that patients dose is varied widely. The measured ESDs ranged from 0.74 to 19.81 mGy for the cranio caudal (CC) view and 1.20 to 25.79 mGy for the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view. The average MGDs per image were 0.88 and 1.11 mGy for CC and MLO views, respectively. Based on the internationally adopted definition, DRL arising from mammography tests for Khorasan is 1.33 mGy. Implementation of a dose reduction programme is suggested because of the large variations observed in patient MGD values. In this study, the DRL value is significantly lower than the corresponding values suggested by other researchers elsewhere. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs317

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Journal Volume
155
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 96-99
ISSN
0144-8420

Optional Information

Notes
11 refs