The Impact of Below Detection Limit Samples in (NPP) Decommissioning Residual Risk Assessment - 17033

There are some technical problems with finalizing regulations and standards that address nuclear power plant (NPP) decommissioning site soil analyses for license termination. It is difficult to know how to best include detection limit observations from site soil analysis, because typical soil collection data is reported above, at, and below the detection limit. In addition, multiple detection limits are required to adequately estimate the soil radionuclide concentrations. In the literature, researchers analyzing environmental data refer to below the detection limit observations as 'left-censored data'. Left-censored data are less than the detection limit of the instrument(s) that made the measurements. Conventional approaches to managing left-censored data either ignore or simply replace the detection limits with zero, a fraction of the detection limit, or the detection limit itself. However, these approaches are statistically biased and limited in their usefulness. The Kaplan-Meier method, robust regression on order statistics method, and maximum likelihood estimation method are proposed to estimate the left-censored data more precisely. The proposed methods are applied to data from a Monazite powder manufacturing plant and the Colorado School of Mines Research Institute. Summary statistics such as the sample mean, sample standard deviation, sample percentiles are calculated from each data set and are used in risk and volume estimation calculations. Previous environmental analyses, such as the exposure assessment, recognize the uncertainty issue that is addressed in this research using the Latin hypercube sampling approach. Next, probabilistic distributions of the input parameters are developed for the uncertainty analyses. Finally, a framework methodology depicting the decision-making process in the proposed method is presented. The framework defines the critical steps, the amount of radioactivity, types of distributions, censoring percentage, sample size, and number of detection limits; it also allows the user to select the appropriate approach based on their site-specific data and analyses. The goal of this research is to develop a more precise risk assessment, estimate of the volume of soil removal, examine potential cost savings. (authors)