Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?
Creators
- 1. School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061 (China)
- 2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Economics and Energy Policy, China Institute for Studies in Energy Policy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005 (China)
Description
Low energy and carbon efficiency and widespread market segmentation are two stylized facts of China's regional economies. This paper evaluates energy and CO2 emissions performance using a newly developed non-radial directional distance function, and China's regional integration is investigated using a price approach. The study points to evidence that: (1) most provinces do not perform efficiently in terms of energy use and CO2 emissions with performance gaps among regions becoming larger, indicating regional segmentation; (2) magnitude of regional integration has increased dramatically, while China's eastern provinces are less integrated in domestic side due to their convenience to international openness; (3) regional integration has significant and robust positive effects on energy and CO2 emissions performance with over 70% of effects coming from artificial barriers, rather than geographical distance; (4) international openness is also beneficial for promoting energy and CO2 emissions performance, but cannot substitute for regional integration because of China's specialization in energy-intensive manufacturing in the global economy. Based on the empirical findings, we suggest that central government should continue to encourage regional integration given that local governments have incentives to fragment because it is a way of promoting energy and CO2 emissions performance and stimulating economy at the same time. - Highlights: • NDDF method is applied to evaluate China's regional energy and carbon performance. • Difficulties in identifying NDDF using parametric approach are discussed. • Panel data of China's regional integration using the price approach is constructed. • Local protectionism is particularly identified by filtering effects of geography. • World trade cannot substitute domestic integration for improving energy efficiency.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.036Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.036;
- PII
- S0301-4215(16)30591-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 101
- Journal Page Range
- p. 366-378
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48085311
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARBON DIOXIDE; CHINA; ECONOMY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EXHAUST GASES; FILTERS; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; GLOBAL ASPECTS; MARKET; PERFORMANCE; PRICES; TRADE
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; EFFICIENCY; FLUIDS; GASEOUS WASTES; GASES; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; WASTES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.