Published November 15, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Removal of priority pollutants from water by means of dielectric barrier discharge atmospheric plasma

  • 1. Instituto de Diagnóstico Ambiental y Estudios del Agua (IDAEA), CID, CSIC, C/Jordi Girona 18-26, E-08034 Barcelona (Spain)
  • 2. Instituto de Química Avanzada de Cataluña (IQAC), CID, CSIC, C/Jordi Girona 18-26, E-08034 Barcelona (Spain)
  • 3. Fraunhofer IGB, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart (Germany)

Description

Highlights: • DBD plasma reactors were used to remove pollutants from aqueous solutions. • Atrazine, chlorfenvinfos, 2,4-dibromophenol and lindane were studied. • First-order degradation kinetics were observed for all the compounds. • Degradation by-products were identified by GC–MS. • Treatment efficiencies were lower in industrial wastewater than in pure water. -- Abstract: Two different nonthermal plasma reactors at atmospheric pressure were assessed for the removal of organic micropollutants (atrazine, chlorfenvinfos, 2,4-dibromophenol, and lindane) from aqueous solutions (1–5 mg L−1) at laboratory scale. Both devices were dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactors; one was a conventional batch reactor (R1) and the other a coaxial thin-falling-water-film reactor (R2). A first-order degradation kinetics was proposed for both experiments. The kinetic constants (k) were slightly faster in R1 (0.534 min−1 for atrazine; 0.567 min−1 for chlorfenvinfos; 0.802 min−1 for 2,4-dibromophenol; 0.389 min−1 for lindane) than in R2 (0.104 min−1 for atrazine; 0.523 min−1 for chlorfenvinfos; 0.273 min−1 for 2,4-dibromophenol; 0.294 min−1 for lindane). However, energy efficiencies were about one order of magnitude higher in R2 (89 mg kW−1 h−1 for atrazine; 447 mg kW−1 h−1 for chlorfenvinfos; 47 mg kW−1 h−1 for 2,4-dibromophenol; 50 mg kW−1 h−1 for lindane) than in R1. Degradation by-products of all four compounds were identified in R1. As expected, when the plasma treatment (R1) was applied to industrial wastewater spiked with atrazine or lindane, micropollutant removal was also achieved, although at a lower rate than with aqueous solutions (k = 0.117 min−1 for atrazine; k = 0.061 min−1 for lindane)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.09.022

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.09.022;
PII
S0304-3894(13)00666-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal Volume
262
Journal Page Range
p. 664-673
ISSN
0304-3894
CODEN
JHMAD9

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.