Evaluation of patients radiation dose and Cancer risk associated with Computed tomography Coronary angiography
Creators
- 1. INAYA Medical Collage, Nuclear Medicine Department, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
- 2. Riyadh Care Hospital, Radiology Department, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
- 3. Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, Alkharj (Saudi Arabia)
- 4. University of Surrey, Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH (United Kingdom)
- 5. Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Radiological Sciences, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia)
Description
Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has generated tremendous interest over the past 20 years because of its high diagnostic accuracy and efficacy in assessing patients with coronary artery disease. This method is related to high radiation dose, and this has raised serious concerns within the literature. Effective dose (E) may be a single parameter meant to reflect the relative risk from radiation exposure. Therefore, it is necessary to calculate this parameter to point relative radiation risk. The objectives of this study are to evaluate patients' exposure during diagnostic and estimate the radiation risk. A total of 790 patients was estimated of radiation risk dose for three years, respectively. The patient's exposure was estimated based on a Computed Tomography device's delivered radiation dose (Siemens Somatom Sensation 64 (64-MDCT)). The participating physicians obtained the parameters relevant to the radiation dose from the scan protocol generated by the CT system after each CTCA study. The parameters included the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and Dlp. The CTDI value, which is a basic radiation dose parameter of CT. The mean and range of CTDI and Dlp for three respective year was (2018) 10.18(42.73-1.14) , 458.2 (3112.64-1.14) , (2019) 15.1 (348.5-1.13), 554.4 (4328.2-1.13) and (2020) 10.2 (50.47-0.7), 393.27 (2575.8-1.13). Therefore, the CT acquisition parameter optimization is vital to reduce the dose to its minimal value. Patients' doses were slightly higher compared to previous studies. (author)
Availability note (English)
Available in abstract form only, full text entered in this recordAdditional details
Publishing Information
- Publisher
- Sociedad Mexicana de Irradiacion y Dosimetria
- Imprint Place
- Ciudad de Mexico (Mexico)
- Imprint Pagination
- 1 p.
Conference
- Title
- 20. international symposium on solid state dosimetry
- Acronym
- ISSSD 2020
- Dates
- 7-11 Dec 2020
- Place
- Mexico City (Mexico)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Mexico
- Country of Input or Organization
- Mexico
- INIS RN
- 52053336
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference, Non-conventional Literature
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARIES; DATA; DIAGNOSIS; EFFECTIVE RADIATION DOSES; EQUIPMENT; HEALTH HAZARDS; INDEXES; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS
- Descriptors DEC
- ARTERIES; BLOOD VESSELS; BODY; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; DOSES; EVALUATION; HAZARDS; INFORMATION; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Funding organization
- Sociedad Mexicana de Irradiacion y Dosimetria (Mexico)