Thermodynamic analysis of a gas turbine inlet air cooling and recovering system in gas turbine and CO2 combined cycle using cold energy from LNG terminal
- 1. Strategy & Innovation Division, Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co. Ltd, 10 Suji-ro 112beon-gil, Suji-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 16858 (Korea, Republic of)
- 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826 (Korea, Republic of)
Description
Highlights: • A novel combined cycle power plant utilizing LNG cold energy is proposed. • A gas turbine inlet air cooling and recovering system is applied to the novel CCPP. • A simulation is conducted to compare the proposed plant with a conventional CCPP. • The proposed CCPP shows enhanced power output by 25.4% and efficiency by 11.5%. Research on the CO2 cycle has been conducted in various fields, such as nuclear power plants, centralized solar power plants, coal-fired power plants, waste heat recovery, combined cycle, and LNG cold energy recovery. In contrast to the steam Rankine cycle, the CO2 cycle is able to utilize the sub-zero temperature heat sink using LNG cold energy. In this study, a novel configuration is proposed that the gas turbine-carbon dioxide combined cycle power plant (GT-CO2 CCPP) with a gas turbine inlet air cooling (TIAC) and heat recovering (HR) system when using LNG cold energy. The TIAC and HR system cools the gas turbine inlet air using condensate CO2 to enhance the power output while air energy is simultaneously recovered to the CO2 bottoming cycle for additional power output and higher efficiency. To determine the capacity of this type of plant, the most commonly implemented LNG terminal is investigated, and the 62 MW medium-size gas turbine is selected for a simulation case study. The thermal performance potential of the proposed configuration is analyzed and compared to a conventional GT-steam CCPP, a GT- CO2 CCPP without the TIAC and HR system. The results show that the relative power output is enhanced by 14.9% and that the efficiency is improved by 2.1% (1.4%p) compared to the GT- CO2 CCPP without it. Meanwhile, this system enables higher power output and efficiency by 25.4% and 11.5% (6.8%p), respectively, compared to the conventional GT-steam CCPP, and the effect is increased according to the ambient temperature.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113802Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113802;
- PII
- S019689042031325X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Journal Volume
- 230
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0196-8904
- CODEN
- ECMADL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54033577
- Subject category
- S42: ENGINEERING; S03: NATURAL GAS;
- Descriptors DEI
- AMBIENT TEMPERATURE; BOTTOMING CYCLES; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMBINED CYCLES; COMBINED-CYCLE POWER PLANTS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; CONDENSATES; GAS TURBINES; HEAT RECOVERY; HEAT SINKS; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RANKINE CYCLE; SOLAR POWER PLANTS; THERMODYNAMICS; WASTE HEAT
- Descriptors DEC
- CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; ENERGY; ENERGY RECOVERY; ENERGY SOURCES; EQUIPMENT; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; HEAT; LIQUEFIED GASES; LIQUIDS; MACHINERY; NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; POWER PLANTS; SIMULATION; SINKS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES; TURBINES; TURBOMACHINERY; WASTES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.