Published August 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Patient dosimetry during chest, abdomen, skull and neck radiography in SW Nigeria

  • 1. Department of Physics with Electronics, Ajayi Crowther University, P.M.B 1066, Oyo (Nigeria)
  • 2. Department of Physics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State (Nigeria)
  • 3. Department of Physical Sciences, Bells University of Technology, Ota, Ogun State (Nigeria)
  • 4. Department of Radiology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Osun State (Nigeria)

Description

The technique factors and X-ray output from the X-ray units of three Nigerian hospitals were obtained and used to calculate doses delivered to patients during chest, abdomen, skull and neck examinations. DoseCal software was used to calculate the entrance skin dose (ESD) and effective dose (E) based on the values of technique factors employed. The result obtained for inter-hospital comparison showed wide variation of mean hospital ESD, from a factor of 1.3 for chest posteroanterior (PA) in hospital 2 (H2) to a factor of 63 for the same chest X-ray projection in hospital 1 (H1). A comparison of ESD obtained in this work with established reference doses in the United Kingdom (UK 2005 review), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Community of European Commission (CEC), Ghana and Sudan shows that the values of ESD obtained in H1 for five examinations; namely: chest (PA) and lateral (LAT), abdomen anteroposterior (AP) and skull (PA and LAT) are higher. In H2, the dose value for chest PA is about 50% higher than that of UK but comparable with CEC and less than IAEA and Ghanaian values. The dose values obtained in H3 chest PA are higher than UK, IAEA and CEC values but comparable with that of Ghana. For abdomen AP, the dose is a factor of 1.2 less than IAEA and CEC values but greater than the UK, Ghanaian and Sudanese values by a factor of 2.1, 1.2 and 4.5, respectively. Reference data for abdomen LAT and neck AP were not available for comparison. Higher effective doses are being delivered to patients in chest PA (H1 and H3) and abdomen AP (H1) when compared with the range of values reported in the literature. This trend is an indication that patients examined are at higher health risks.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2010.05.009

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radi.2010.05.009;
PII
S1078-8174(10)00059-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiography (London 1995)
Journal Volume
17
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 245-249
ISSN
1078-8174

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
43064735
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ABDOMEN; CHEST; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DOSES; DOSIMETRY; HEALTH HAZARDS; HOSPITALS; IAEA; NECK; NIGERIA; PATIENTS; SKIN; SKULL; X RADIATION
Descriptors DEC
AFRICA; BODY; BUILDINGS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; EVALUATION; HAZARDS; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; IONIZING RADIATIONS; MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS; ORGANS; RADIATIONS; SKELETON

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.