Published December 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

The impact of residential, commercial, and transport energy demand uncertainties in Asia on climate change mitigation

Description

Energy consumption in residential, commercial and transport sectors have been growing rapidly in the non-OECD Asian countries over the last decades, and the trend is expected to continue over the coming decades as well. However, the per capita projections for energy demand in these particular sectors often seem to be very low compared to the OECD average until 2050, and it is clear that the scenario assessments of final energy demands in these sectors include large uncertainties. In this paper, a sensitivity analysis have been carried out to study the impact of higher rates of energy demand growths in the non-OECD Asia on global mitigation costs. The long term energy and emission scenarios for China, India and South-East Asia have been contributed as a part of Asian Modeling Exercise (AME). The scenarios presented have been modeled by using a global TIMES-VTT energy system model, which is based on the IEA-ETSAP TIMES energy system modeling framework and the global ETSAP-TIAM model. Our scenario results indicate that the impacts of accelerated energy demand in the non-OECD Asia has a relatively small impact on the global marginal costs of greenhouse gas abatement. However, with the accelerated demand projections, the average per capita greenhouse gas emissions in the OECD were decreased while China, India, and South-East Asia increased their per capita greenhouse gas emissions. This indicates that the costs of the greenhouse gas abatement would especially increase in the OECD region, if developing Asian countries increase their final energy consumption more rapidly than expected. - Highlights: ► Scenarios of final energy demands in developing Asia include large uncertainties. ► Impact of accelerated Asian energy demand on global mitigation costs is quite low. ► Accelerated Asian energy consumption increases GHG abatement costs in the OECD. ► 3.7 W/m3 target is feasible in costs even with accelerated Asian energy demands. ► 2.6 W/m2 target is beyond reasonable costs even with our base assumptions.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.05.003

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.eneco.2012.05.003;
PII
S0140-9883(12)00105-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Economics
Journal Volume
34
Journal Issue
Suppl.3
Journal Page Range
p. S410-S420
ISSN
0140-9883
CODEN
EECODR

INIS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.