Published May 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India

  • 1. Institute for Sustainable Building Design, School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society (EGIS), Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh (United Kingdom)
  • 2. The Urban Institute, School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society (EGIS), Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh (United Kingdom)
  • 3. Dept. of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi (India)

Description

Highlights: • India's residential scale DR remains an untapped area. • Practitioners perception of DR is coloured by technology saviourism. • Agency and negotiations are key issues that will determine householder's acceptability of DR. • Future residential DR policy must be driven by a co-production process. With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is not new, yet utility-driven residential-scale demand response (DR) remains an unexplored area. This paper contributes on two fronts – to explicate householders and practitioner's perceptions of DR: disjunctions between these perceptions and its implications for the acceptance of residential DR. Using a co-production approach, this paper draws insights from two sets of stakeholders in India - 25 DR policy and utility experts and 24 household consumers. Our results show that technological saviourism pervasively underscores practitioners understanding of DR and householder agency, a crucial factor in the adoption of DR at the residential scale remains a missing piece. The paper concludes that without considering householder agency, delivering a decarbonised future based on demand response will be challenging and consumers may remain locked into-existing socio-cultural practices that negate the adoption of DR.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222;
PII
S0301421521000914;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
152
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54023775
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; HOUSEHOLDS; PLANNING; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
Descriptors DEC
ENERGY SOURCES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC UTILITIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.