Incorporating radiomics into clinical trials. Expert consensus endorsed by the European Society of Radiology on considerations for data-driven compared to biologically driven quantitative biomarkers
Creators
- 1. Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels (Belgium)
- 2. European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology, Vienna (Austria)
- 3. PARCC, INSERM, Radiology Department, AP-HP, Hopital europeen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, F-75015, Paris (France)
- 4. School of Medicine, University of Patras, University Campus, Rio, 26 500, Patras (Greece)
- 5. College of Science, University of Lincoln, LN6 7TS, Lincoln (United Kingdom)
- 6. Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), B-1200, Brussels (Belgium)
Description
Existing quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) are associated with known biological tissue characteristics and follow a well-understood path of technical, biological and clinical validation before incorporation into clinical trials. In radiomics, novel data-driven processes extract numerous visually imperceptible statistical features from the imaging data with no a priori assumptions on their correlation with biological processes. The selection of relevant features (radiomic signature) and incorporation into clinical trials therefore requires additional considerations to ensure meaningful imaging endpoints. Also, the number of radiomic features tested means that power calculations would result in sample sizes impossible to achieve within clinical trials. This article examines how the process of standardising and validating data-driven imaging biomarkers differs from those based on biological associations. Radiomic signatures are best developed initially on datasets that represent diversity of acquisition protocols as well as diversity of disease and of normal findings, rather than within clinical trials with standardised and optimised protocols as this would risk the selection of radiomic features being linked to the imaging process rather than the pathology. Normalisation through discretisation and feature harmonisation are essential pre-processing steps. Biological correlation may be performed after the technical and clinical validity of a radiomic signature is established, but is not mandatory. Feature selection may be part of discovery within a radiomics-specific trial or represent exploratory endpoints within an established trial; a previously validated radiomic signature may even be used as a primary/secondary endpoint, particularly if associations are demonstrated with specific biological processes and pathways being targeted within clinical trials.
Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology (Internet)
- Journal Volume
- 31
- Journal Issue
- 8
- Journal Page Range
- p. 6001-6012
- ISSN
- 1432-1084
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 52114233
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ALGORITHMS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CLINICAL TRIALS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CORRELATIONS; DATA-FLOW PROCESSING; DATASETS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PATHOLOGY; RADIOLOGY; RECOMMENDATIONS; STANDARDIZATION; SURVIVAL CURVES; TRAINING; VALIDATION
- Descriptors DEC
- DOCUMENT TYPES; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PROCESSING; PROGRAMMING; TESTING
Optional Information
- Notes
- This record replaces 52106509
- Collaborations
- European Society of Radiology