Published March 2004 | Version v1
Journal article

Deregulated power prices: comparison of diurnal patterns

Description

We examine electrical power price, and in particular its daily and average weekday vs. weekend pattern of change, for 14 deregulated markets. Power price in deregulated markets shows fundamentally different patterns. North American markets show a monotonic diurnal weekday price pattern, while all other markets studied show more than one price peak. Deregulated power markets differ in maximum vs. minimum daily average price and in average weekday to weekend price, in turn creating a different incentive for a consumer to time shift power consuming activities. Markets differ in the extent to which a small fraction of the days shapes the average diurnal pattern and value of price. Deregulated markets show a wide variation in the correlation between load and price. Some deregulated markets, most notably Britain and Spain, show patterns that are predictable and consistent, and hence that can encourage a customer to shape consumption behaviors. Other markets, for example South Australia, have patterns that are inconsistent and irregular, and hence are hard for a customer to interpret; a customer in such a market will have a higher incentive to escape risk through hedging mechanisms

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00331-2;
arXiv
arXiv:quant-ph/9811077v1;
PII
S0301421502003312;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
32
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 657-672
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
36011567
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DEREGULATION; MARKET; PEAK LOAD; PRICES; SOUTH AUSTRALIA; SPAIN
Descriptors DEC
AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EUROPE; EVALUATION; WESTERN EUROPE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.