Deregulated power prices: comparison of diurnal patterns
Creators
Description
We examine electrical power price, and in particular its daily and average weekday vs. weekend pattern of change, for 14 deregulated markets. Power price in deregulated markets shows fundamentally different patterns. North American markets show a monotonic diurnal weekday price pattern, while all other markets studied show more than one price peak. Deregulated power markets differ in maximum vs. minimum daily average price and in average weekday to weekend price, in turn creating a different incentive for a consumer to time shift power consuming activities. Markets differ in the extent to which a small fraction of the days shapes the average diurnal pattern and value of price. Deregulated markets show a wide variation in the correlation between load and price. Some deregulated markets, most notably Britain and Spain, show patterns that are predictable and consistent, and hence that can encourage a customer to shape consumption behaviors. Other markets, for example South Australia, have patterns that are inconsistent and irregular, and hence are hard for a customer to interpret; a customer in such a market will have a higher incentive to escape risk through hedging mechanisms
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00331-2;
- arXiv
- arXiv:quant-ph/9811077v1;
- PII
- S0301421502003312;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 32
- Journal Issue
- 5
- Journal Page Range
- p. 657-672
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 36011567
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DEREGULATION; MARKET; PEAK LOAD; PRICES; SOUTH AUSTRALIA; SPAIN
- Descriptors DEC
- AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EUROPE; EVALUATION; WESTERN EUROPE
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.