Published April 1, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

One Channel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways

  • 1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208 (United States)
  • 2. Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA), 1800 Sherman Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201 (United States)
  • 3. Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva, Chemin Pegasi 51, 1290 Versoix (Switzerland)
  • 4. Institute of Astrophysics, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001, Leuven (Belgium)
  • 5. Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (United States)
  • 6. Gravity Exploration Institute, School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 3AA (United Kingdom)
  • 7. Enrico Fermi Institute and Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, The University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637 (United States)

Description

The second LIGO–Virgo catalog of gravitational-wave (GW) transients has more than quadrupled the observational sample of binary black holes. We analyze this catalog using a suite of five state-of-the-art binary black hole population models covering a range of isolated and dynamical formation channels and infer branching fractions between channels as well as constraints on uncertain physical processes that impact the observational properties of mergers. Given our set of formation models, we find significant differences between the branching fractions of the underlying and detectable populations, and the diversity of detections suggests that multiple formation channels are at play. A mixture of channels is strongly preferred over any single channel dominating the detected population: an individual channel does not contribute to more than ≃70% of the observational sample of binary black holes. We calculate the preference between the natal spin assumptions and common-envelope efficiencies in our models, favoring natal spins of isolated black holes of ≲0.1 and marginally preferring common-envelope efficiencies of ≳2.0 while strongly disfavoring highly inefficient common envelopes. We show that it is essential to consider multiple channels when interpreting GW catalogs, as inference on branching fractions and physical prescriptions becomes biased when contributing formation scenarios are not considered or incorrect physical prescriptions are assumed. Although our quantitative results can be affected by uncertain assumptions in model predictions, our methodology is capable of including models with updated theoretical considerations and additional formation channels.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abe40e

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Astrophysical Journal
Journal Volume
910
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
[18 p.]
ISSN
0004-637X
CODEN
ASJOAB

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53081554
Subject category
S79: ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY; S47: OTHER INSTRUMENTATION;
Descriptors DEI
BLACK HOLES; BRANCHING RATIO; DETECTION; EFFICIENCY; FORECASTING; GRAVITATIONAL WAVES; SPIN; TRANSIENTS
Descriptors DEC
ANGULAR MOMENTUM; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; PARTICLE PROPERTIES