Development of the smart photovoltaic system blind and its impact on net-zero energy solar buildings using technical-economic-political analyses
- 1. Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon (Hong Kong)
- 2. Department of Architectural Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722 (Korea, Republic of)
- 3. Republic of Korea Marine Corps, P.O. Box # 202-8, Yeonpyeong, Ongjin, Incheon, 23108 (Korea, Republic of)
Description
It is expected that the rooftop photovoltaic (PV) systems can realize net-zero energy solar buildings (nZESBs), but it is not enough by itself. To realize 100% of nZESBs, the smart photovoltaic system blind (SPSB) was proposed to generate electricity in the PV system and to reduce indoor cooling demands through the shading effect in the blind system. Before its implementation, this study aims to investigate the impact of the proposed SPSB on nZESBs, which is conducted in three ways (i.e., technical, economic, and political analyses). The detailed results can be summarized as follows: (i) technical analysis: when applying the SPSBCIGS&2-axis (which represents the SPSB with the copper-indium-gallium-selenide (CIGS) PV panel and the two-axis tracking system), its energy self-sufficiency rate was determined to be 1.25–2.31 times superior to other alternatives; (ii) economic analysis: in terms of the NPV25 (net present value at year 25), SPSBCIGS&2-axis was determined to be 1.41–2.97 times superior to others; in terms of the SIR25 (savings-to-investment ratio at year 25), 1.14–1.26 times; and in terms of the break-even point, 1.4–3.0 years; and (iii) political analysis: the grid-connected utilization plan including solar renewable energy certificates (GCincl.SREC plan) was determined to improve the economic profitability of the proposed SPSB. - Highlights: • The smart photovoltaic system blind was developed as prototype model in four ways. • The SPSBCIGS&2-axis was determined to be superior to other prototype models. • A holistic analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of the SPSB on nZESBs. • When implementing the GCincl.SREC plan, the economic profitability was maximized. • Results showed the NPV25 (US$2.37/m2), SIR25 (2.97 times), and BEP (7.6 years).
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.088Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.088;
- PII
- S0360-5442(17)30270-0;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 124
- Journal Page Range
- p. 382-396
- ISSN
- 0360-5442
- CODEN
- ENEYDS
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48089359
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- BUILDINGS; COOLING; COPPER; COPPER COMPOUNDS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY DEMAND; GALLIUM; GALLIUM SELENIDES; GRIDS; IMPLEMENTATION; INDIUM; INDIUM COMPOUNDS; INVESTMENT; LIFE CYCLE; LIFE-CYCLE COST; PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECT; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS; SOLAR CELLS
- Descriptors DEC
- CHALCOGENIDES; COST; DEMAND; DIRECT ENERGY CONVERTERS; ECONOMICS; ELECTRODES; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; EQUIPMENT; GALLIUM COMPOUNDS; INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS; METALS; PHOTOELECTRIC CELLS; PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; SELENIDES; SELENIUM COMPOUNDS; SOLAR EQUIPMENT; TRANSITION ELEMENT COMPOUNDS; TRANSITION ELEMENTS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.