GEP-NET radiomics. A systematic review and radiomics quality score assessment
Creators
- 1. The Netherlands Cancer Institute/University Medical Center Utrecht Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam/Utrecht (Netherlands)
- 2. GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht (Netherlands)
- 3. Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
- 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
- 5. Scientific Information Service, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
- 6. Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
- 7. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 19, 3, 5000, Odense (Denmark)
Description
The number of radiomics studies in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) is rapidly increasing. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the available evidence of radiomics for clinical outcome measures in GEP-NETs, to understand which applications hold the most promise and which areas lack evidence. PubMed, Embase, and Wiley/Cochrane Library databases were searched and a forward and backward reference check of the identified studies was executed. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with GEP-NETs and (2) radiomics analysis on CT, MRI or PET. Two reviewers independently agreed on eligibility and assessed methodological quality with the radiomics quality score (RQS) and extracted outcome data. In total, 1364 unique studies were identified and 45 were included for analysis. Most studies focused on GEP-NET grade and differential diagnosis of GEP-NETs from other neoplasms, while only a minority analysed treatment response or long-term outcomes. Several studies were able to predict tumour grade or to differentiate GEP-NETs from other lesions with a good performance (AUCs 0.74-0.96 and AUCs 0.80-0.99, respectively). Only one study developed a model to predict recurrence in pancreas NETs (AUC 0.77). The included studies reached a mean RQS of 18%. Although radiomics for GEP-NETs is still a relatively new area, some promising models have been developed. Future research should focus on developing robust models for clinically relevant aims such as prediction of response or long-term outcome in GEP-NET, since evidence for these aims is still scarce. The majority of radiomics studies in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours is of low quality. Most evidence for radiomics is available for the identification of tumour grade or differentiation of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours from other neoplasms. Radiomics for the prediction of response or long-term outcome in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours warrants further research.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08996-wAdditional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology (Internet)
- Journal Volume
- 32
- Journal Issue
- 10
- Journal Page Range
- p. 7278-7294
- ISSN
- 1432-1084
- CODEN
- EURAE3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 53110050
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- DIAGNOSIS; ENDOCRINE DISEASES; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; NEOPLASMS; NMR IMAGING; PANCREAS; POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOMICS; REVIEWS; SURVIVAL CURVES
- Descriptors DEC
- ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BODY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOCRINE GLANDS; GLANDS; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; PROCESSING; RADIOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY