Published 1987 | Version v1
Book

Selection of strategies for the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle in the United Kingdom

  • 1. UKAEA Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell. Chemistry Div.
  • 2. UKAEA Harwell Lab. (UK). Fuel Processing Directorate

Description

The paper identifies the technical aspects of the three main options for the management of spent thermal reactor fuel in the United Kingdom, i.e. disposal and delayed or immediate reprocessing; compares the requirements for the treatment of thermal and fast reactor fuel; summarizes the UK position for fast reactor fuel, where reprocessing is the only feasible option; and sums up the pressures and trends in reprocessing as shown in current research and in the design of the THORP and European Demonstration Reprocessing Plant projects. The overall conclusion is that the key question is not simply whether or not reprocessing is preferable to dispoal, but also the timing of the answer. This will vary between countries. For a nation such as the UK, which has no indigenous uranium and is already involved in reprocessing, the strategic requirement to maintain the technology seems to take precedence over any minor variations which arise from time to time in the current economic balance between the options. (author). 14 refs, 1 tab

Part of:
Back end of the nuclear fuel cycle: Strategies and options

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
IAEA.
Imprint Place
Vienna (Austria)
ISBN
92-0-050187-7
Imprint Title
Back end of the nuclear fuel cycle: Strategies and options
Imprint Pagination
671 p.
Series
Proceedings series.
Journal Page Range
p. 183-197.

Conference

Title
strategies and options.
Acronym
International symposium on the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle
Dates
11-15 May 1987.
Place
Vienna (Austria).

Optional Information

Secondary number(s)
IAEA-SM--294/46.