Published March 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Environmental impact analysis of power generation from biomass and wind farms in different locations

  • 1. School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819 (China)
  • 2. SEP Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819 (China)
  • 3. Department of Geographical Science, University of Maryland, College Park 20747, MD (United States)

Description

Highlights: • A comparative environmental impact analysis is done for different types of new energy power generation using LCA. • The energy recovery period and enviromental impacts of wind farm in different locations are compared. • The area of wind farm is taken into account in the process of environmental impact analysis. -- Abstract: Accelerated urbanization in China has increased electricity demand. Recently, environmentally-friendly renewable energy resources have become more popular for generating power. Energy consumption and environmental impacts vary depending on the types of renewable energy, while the impacts of such variations are rarely studied in the existing literature. This study used a life-cycle perspective to analyze energy consumption and environmental impacts of wind farms and compared the results to a biomass power plant. The environmental impacts of wind power plants were further analyzed on a site by site basis, using locations in desert (G), steppe (S), and woodland (W) landscapes. The results showed that the G site had the lowest global warming potential of wind power plants at 51.547 gCO2-eq/kWh, about 60% that of the S site and 80% that of W. The global warming potential of the G site was also about 25% of the biomass power plant. Additionally, the G site had a solid waste potential of 25.248 g-eq/kWh, which is only 10% compared to the biomass plant. The results also indicated energy payback times for the G, S, and W wind farms to be 0.67, 2.40, and 1.42 years, respectively. The G site also had an acidification potential of 6.836 gSO2-eq/kWh, which was equivalent to 45% of the S site and 30% that of W. Consequently, wind farms located in the desert have the least environmental impact, followed by those located in the steppe and woodland. Accounting for energy payback time and environmental impacts, this study suggests that wind power plants should be built in desert areas when possible.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.018;
PII
S136403211830813X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Journal Volume
102
Journal Page Range
p. 307-317
ISSN
1364-0321

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55020483
Subject category
S17: WIND ENERGY; S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
Descriptors DEI
BIOMASS; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY RECOVERY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LIFE CYCLE; POWER GENERATION; SOLID WASTES; WIND POWER PLANTS; WIND TURBINE ARRAYS
Descriptors DEC
CLIMATIC CHANGE; ENERGY SOURCES; POWER PLANTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; WASTES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.