HYLIFE-2 progress report
Creators
- Moir, R.W.1
- Adamson, M.G.1
- Bangerter, R.O.1
- Bieri, R.L.1
- Condit, R.H.1
- Hartman, C.W.1
- House, P.A.1
- Langdon, A.B.1
- Logan, B.G.1
- Orth, C.D.1
- Petzoldt, R.W.1
- Pitts, J.H.1
- Post, R.F.1
- Sacks, R.A.1
- Tobin, M.T.1
- Williams, W.H.1
- Dolan, T.J.2
- Longhurst, G.R.2
- Hoffman, M.A.3
- Schrock, V.E.4
- Peterson, P.E.4
- Bai, R.Y.4
- Chen, X.M.4
- Liu, J.C.4
- Sze, D.K.5
- Meier, W.R.6
- 1. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States)
- 2. EG and G Idaho, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
- 3. California Univ., Davis, CA (United States). Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
- 4. California Univ., Berkeley, CA (United States). Dept. of Nuclear Engineering
- 5. Argonne National Lab., IL (United States)
- 6. Schafer (W.J.) Associates, Inc., Pleasanton, CA (United States)
Description
LIFE-II inertial confinement fusion power plant design study uses a liquid fall, in the form of jets to protect the first structural wall from neutron damage, x rays, and blast to provide a 30-y lifetime. This is a progress report of an incomplete and ongoing study. HYLIFE-I used liquid lithium. HYLIFE-11 avoids the fire hazard of lithium by using a molten salt composed of fluorine, lithium, and beryllium (Li2Be4) called Flibe. Access for heavy-ion beams is provided. Calculations for assumed heavy-ion beam performance show a nominal gain of 70 at 5 MJ producing 350 MJ, about 5.2 times less yield than the 1.8 GJ from a driver energy of 4.5 MJ with gain of 400 for HYLIFE-I. The nominal 1 GWe of power can be maintained by increasing the repetition rate by a factor of about 5.2, from 1.5 to 8 Hz. A higher repetition rate requires faster re-establishment of the jets after a shot, which can be accomplished in part by decreasing the jet fall height and increasing the jet flow velocity. Multiple chambers may be required.In addition, although not considered for HYLIFE-I there is undoubtedly liquid splash that must be forcibly cleared because gravity is too slow, especially at high repetition rates. Splash removal can be accomplished by either pulsed or oscillating jet flows. The cost of electricity is estimated to be 0.10 $/kW· in constant 1990 dollars, about twice that of future coal and light water reactor nuclear power. The driver beam cost is about one-half the total cost
Availability note (English)
MF available from INIS under the Report Number; OSTI as DE92040947; NTIS; INIS; US Govt. Printing Office Dep.Files
24017823.pdf
Files
(8.9 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:0d8cdcdce4fdfe1442611bf5e20f5157
|
8.9 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 283 p.
- Report number
- UCID--21816
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 24017823
- Subject category
- S70: PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY;
- Descriptors DEI
- COST; DESIGN; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FLIBE; HYDRAULICS; HYLIFE CONVERTER; INERTIAL CONFINEMENT; LASER TARGETS; RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL; RESEARCH PROGRAMS; SAFETY; TARGET CHAMBERS; THERMONUCLEAR REACTOR MATERIAL; TRITIUM RECOVERY
- Descriptors DEC
- ACCELERATOR FACILITIES; CONFINEMENT; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS; MOLTEN SALTS; PLASMA CONFINEMENT; SALTS; TARGETS; THERMONUCLEAR DEVICES; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT
Optional Information
- Contract/Grant/Project number
- Contract W-7405-ENG-48
- Funding organization
- USDOE, Washington, DC (United States).