Published July 2002 | Version v1
Report

How Can Economies in Transition Pursue Emissions Trading or Joint Implementation?

  • 1. UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Roskilde (Denmark)

Description

Under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, economies in transition are eligible for both emissions trading (Article 17) and joint implementation (Article 6). Guiding rules for implementing these mechanisms were decided through the Marrakech Accords in November 2001. These countries may benefit substantially from those mechanisms if they are implemented appropriately. However, with the departure of the USA from the Kyoto Protocol, the likely revenues from international emissions trading for the economies in transition are likely to be limited at least during the first commitment period. A key criterion on whether countries should undertake emissions trading is the comparison of projections of emissions until 2012 with the target under the Kyoto Protocol. For joint implementation, the investment climate and the emission reductions potential of a specific project are more important. Countries that are bound by the Kyoto Protocol need to implement a clear institutional structure, which includes a JI office or a position solely in charge of JI. Even if a country decides not to engage in JI, such an office could help guide possible foreign investors

Availability note (English)

Available from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/WPapers/default.htm), Corso Magenta, 63, 20123 Milan (IT)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
26 p.
Report number
FEEM-SUST--59-2002

INIS

Country of Publication
Italy
Country of Input or Organization
Italy
INIS RN
36003006
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
CLIMATIC CHANGE; EMISSIONS TRADING; IMPLEMENTATION; INVESTMENT; JOINT VENTURES; KYOTO PROTOCOL; PLANNING
Descriptors DEC
AGREEMENTS; COOPERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS; MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS