Published May 1, 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

The Ratio of Positive to Excised Nodes Identifies High-risk Subsets and Reduces Inter-Institutional Differences in Locoregional Recurrence Risk Estimates in Breast Cancer Patients With 1-3 Positive Nodes: An Analysis of Prospective Data From British Columbia and the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC (Canada) and Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit, British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC (Canada)
  • 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
  • 3. Department of Medical Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC (Canada)
  • 4. Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit, British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC (Canada)
  • 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC (Canada)

Description

Purpose: To examine the power of the nodal ratio (NR) of positive/excised nodes in predicting postmastectomy locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with 1-3 positive nodes (N+) and in identifying cohorts at similar risk across independent data sets. Methods and Materials: Data from 82 patients with 1-3 N+ treated without postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in the British Columbia (BC) randomized trial were compared with data from 462 patients treated without PMRT in prospective chemotherapy trials at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). Kaplan-Meier LRR curves were compared between centers using the absolute number of N+ and nodal ratios. Results: The median number of excised nodes was 10 in BC and 16 in MDACC (p < 0.001). Examining LRR by number of N+, the 10-year LRR rate for patients with 1-3 N+ was higher in BC compared with MDACC (21.5% vs. 12.6%; p = 0.02). However, when examining LRR using NR, no differences were found between institutions. In patients with NR ≤ 0.20, the 10-year LRR rate was 17.7% BC vs. 10.9% MDACC (p = 0.27). In patients with NR ≥ 0.20, the 10-year LRR rate was 28.7% BC vs. 22.7% MDACC (p = 0.32). On Cox regression analysis, NR was a stronger prognostic factor compared with number of N +. Conclusions: In patients with 1-3 N+, evaluating nodal positivity using NR reduced inter-institutional differences in LRR estimates that may exist due to variations in numbers of nodes excised. Nodal ratio >0.20 was associated with LRR >20%, warranting PMRT consideration. Nodal ratio may be useful for extrapolating data from prospective trials to clinical practices in which axillary staging extent vary

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.017;
PII
S0360-3016(06)03631-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
68
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 59-65
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
38101841
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BRITISH COLUMBIA; CARCINOMAS; CHEMOTHERAPY; HEALTH HAZARDS; MAMMARY GLANDS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CANADA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DISEASES; GLANDS; HAZARDS; MATHEMATICS; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NORTH AMERICA; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; STATISTICS; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, All rights reserved.