Published October 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluating public policy mechanisms for climate change mitigation in Brazilian buildings sector

  • 1. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP, Núcleo Interdisciplinar de Planejamento Energético (NIPE), Campinas, SP 13083-896 (Brazil)
  • 2. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, UNICAMP, Faculdade de Engenharia Mecânica and International Energy Initiative, IEI-LA, Caixa Postal 6122, Campinas, SP 13083-970 (Brazil)

Description

This paper applies a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and marginal abatement cost curves (MACC) to evaluate public policies mechanisms to promote the dissemination of energy efficiency (EE) and on-site renewable energy sources (RES) technologies in Brazilian buildings sector. The objective here is to bring together the advantages of both methods in order to provide more valuable insights to policy makers. The MCA results show that in the case of more integrative policies, which considers, for instance, potential of jobs creation, the mechanisms to foster distributed RES and solar water heaters are better ranked than in MACC analysis, where only cost-effectiveness of each option is evaluated. Other key finding is that: (1) there is a significant cost effective potential that could be reached through alternative mechanisms not implemented yet in the country, such as public procurement regulation and building codes and; (2) minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) could be broader in scope and more stringent and include the use of energy in standby mode and tubular fluorescent lamps. In particular, some important appliances such as large air conditioning devices should have more aggressive MEPS. - Highlights: • We apply a multi-criteria analysis to evaluate EE and RES policies mechanisms. • We apply marginal abatement cost curves to evaluate EE and RES policies mechanisms. • We provide rankings of mechanisms according to their prospective potential impacts. • There is a significant cost effective energy saving potential in Brazilian buildings. • Brazil should improve MEPS and implement other policy mechanisms

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.056

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.056;
PII
S0301-4215(13)00541-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
61
Journal Page Range
p. 1200-1211
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.