Published April 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Emergy evaluation of agricultural sustainability of Northwest China before and after the grain-for-green policy

  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101 (China)
  • 2. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049 (China)
  • 3. Institute of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121 (China)

Description

China's grain-for-green policy (GFGP) was implemented with the goal of improving ecological security. Consequently, agricultural energy and agrochemical inputs have been significantly increased to improve food security and to increase the income of farmers in the regions where the GFGP was implemented. In analysis of the sustainability of the agricultural system affected by the GFGP, it is essential to consider both economic profitability and environmental sustainability. Using Yanchi County as a case study area, this study used an emergy synthesis to examine the sustainability of the agricultural system before and after the GFGP in Northwest China. We found that the total emergy input and energy output of the agricultural system in the study area increased from 1991 to 2008; however, the sustainability of the system declined, and this decline was especially evident after the GFGP was launched in 2001. Increasing inputs of non-renewable purchased resources will not only reduce the effectiveness of the GFGP in Northwest China, but also hinder the implementation of the energy-saving and emission-reduction policy that China launched in 2005. We suggest that sustainable agricultural development in Northwest China should be based on effective use of renewable resources and development of a low-carbon agricultural economy. - Highlights: • The total emergy input and energy output of the study system increased from 1991 to 2008. • The change of each emergy index was more evident after the GFGP launched in 2001. • The increase in input of non-renewable purchased resources will gradually reduce the function of the GFGP in West China. • Agricultural development in West China should be based on organic agriculture

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.060

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.060;
PII
S0301-4215(13)01324-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
67
Journal Page Range
p. 508-516
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46068658
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AGRICULTURE; AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; BIOMASS; CARBON; CHINA; ECONOMY; ENERGY SECURITY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FARMS; INCOME; SUSTAINABILITY
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; NONMETALS; POLLUTION ABATEMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.