Emergy evaluation of agricultural sustainability of Northwest China before and after the grain-for-green policy
Creators
- 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101 (China)
- 2. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049 (China)
- 3. Institute of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121 (China)
Description
China's grain-for-green policy (GFGP) was implemented with the goal of improving ecological security. Consequently, agricultural energy and agrochemical inputs have been significantly increased to improve food security and to increase the income of farmers in the regions where the GFGP was implemented. In analysis of the sustainability of the agricultural system affected by the GFGP, it is essential to consider both economic profitability and environmental sustainability. Using Yanchi County as a case study area, this study used an emergy synthesis to examine the sustainability of the agricultural system before and after the GFGP in Northwest China. We found that the total emergy input and energy output of the agricultural system in the study area increased from 1991 to 2008; however, the sustainability of the system declined, and this decline was especially evident after the GFGP was launched in 2001. Increasing inputs of non-renewable purchased resources will not only reduce the effectiveness of the GFGP in Northwest China, but also hinder the implementation of the energy-saving and emission-reduction policy that China launched in 2005. We suggest that sustainable agricultural development in Northwest China should be based on effective use of renewable resources and development of a low-carbon agricultural economy. - Highlights: • The total emergy input and energy output of the study system increased from 1991 to 2008. • The change of each emergy index was more evident after the GFGP launched in 2001. • The increase in input of non-renewable purchased resources will gradually reduce the function of the GFGP in West China. • Agricultural development in West China should be based on organic agriculture
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.060Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.060;
- PII
- S0301-4215(13)01324-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 67
- Journal Page Range
- p. 508-516
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46068658
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AGRICULTURE; AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; BIOMASS; CARBON; CHINA; ECONOMY; ENERGY SECURITY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FARMS; INCOME; SUSTAINABILITY
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; ELEMENTS; ENERGY SOURCES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; NONMETALS; POLLUTION ABATEMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.