Published February 27, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Monte Carlo simulation of beam characteristics from small fields based on TrueBeam flattening-filter-free mode

  • 1. Key laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Radiological Protection, Beijing, 100088 (China)
  • 2. Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fuchen Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100142 (China)

Description

Through the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of 6 and 10 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams from Varian TrueBeam accelerator, this study aims to find the best incident electron distribution for further studying the small field characteristics of these beams. By incorporating the training materials of Varian on the geometry and material parameters of TrueBeam Linac head, the 6 and 10 MV FFF beams were modelled using the BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc codes, where the percentage depth doses (PDDs) and the off-axis ratios (OARs) curves of fields ranging from 4 × 4 to 40 × 40 cm2 were simulated for both energies by adjusting the incident beam energy, radial intensity distribution and angular spread, respectively. The beam quality and relative output factor (ROF) were calculated. The simulations and measurements were compared using Gamma analysis method provided by Verisoft program (PTW, Freiburg, Germany), based on which the optimal MC model input parameters were selected and were further used to investigate the beam characteristics of small fields. The Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM), mono-energetic energy and angular spread of the resultant incident Gaussian radial intensity electron distribution were 0.75 mm, 6.1 MeV and 0.9° for the nominal 6 MV FFF beam, and 0.7 mm, 10.8 MeV and 0.3° for the nominal 10 MV FFF beam respectively. The simulation was mostly comparable to the measurement. Gamma criteria of 1 mm/1 % (local dose) can be met by all PDDs of fields larger than 1 × 1 cm2, and by all OARs of no larger than 20 × 20 cm2, otherwise criteria of 1 mm/2 % can be fulfilled. Our MC simulated ROFs agreed well with the measured ROFs of various field sizes (the discrepancies were less than 1 %), except for the 1 × 1 cm2 field. The MC simulation agrees well with the measurement and the proposed model parameters can be clinically used for further dosimetric studies of 6 and 10 MV FFF beams

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0601-2; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4769502

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Oncology (Online)
Journal Volume
11
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
1748-717X

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47072148
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ACCIDENTS; BEAMS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; DOSIMETRY; LINEAR ACCELERATORS; MEV RANGE 01-10; MEV RANGE 10-100; MONTE CARLO METHOD
Descriptors DEC
ACCELERATORS; CALCULATION METHODS; ENERGY RANGE; MEV RANGE; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; SIMULATION; SPATIAL DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) Feng et al. 2016
Notes
PMCID: PMC4769502; PMID: 26921246; PUBLISHER-ID: 601; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4769502