Published August 19, 2020
| Version v1
Journal article
Patient expectations are better for immunotherapy than traditional chemotherapy for cancer
Creators
- 1. University Hospital Heidelberg. Division of Psychooncology, Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatic (Germany)
- 2. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg. Department of Medical Oncology (Germany)
- 3. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). Department of Translational Medical Oncology (Germany)
- 4. University Hospital Heidelberg and Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL). Department of Thoracic Oncology (Germany)
Description
Purpose
: The main aim of the study was to explore the expectations and knowledge of advanced-stage cancer patients about immunotherapy.Methods
: This mixed methods study included 53 cancer patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 55 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (CT), and 53 non-cancer patients. Participants' expectations about ICIs and CT were compared. Additional qualitative data were derived from semi-structured interviews.Results
: Among patients who did not receive ICIs, 63 (58%) had never heard of ICIs and 94 (87%) had large gaps in their knowledge of ICIs. Among ICI patients, 33 (62%) simply described ICIs without errors. ICI perception was positive, regardless of whether respondents received or had heard of ICIs, which became particularly evident when compared to CT. ICIs were rated as more promising, and all adverse effects were expected to be significantly lower than those of CT. Knowledge about ICIs was also limited in the interviewed ICI patients. Some patients reported adverse effects of ICIs that were mostly mild and well-tolerated or easily treated.Conclusions
: The lack of understanding of ICIs should be improved by activities to increase the knowledge of ICI patients and the general population. In contrast to CT, ICIs invoked fewer negative associations with efficacy and toxicity. Therefore, attention should be paid to risk awareness when educating patients. (Clinical trial registration number: DRKS00011868)Trial Registration: German clinical trials register, www.germanctr.de, number DRKS00011868.Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
- Journal Volume
- 146
- Journal Issue
- 12
- Journal Page Range
- p. 3189-3198
- ISSN
- 0171-5216
- CODEN
- JCROD7
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 55071833
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CAT SCANNING; CHEMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL TRIALS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASE INCIDENCE; ERRORS; HEALTH HAZARDS; IMMUNOTHERAPY; MEDICAL RECORDS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEX; STANDARD OF LIVING; TOXICITY
- Descriptors DEC
- COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EVALUATION; HAZARDS; MEDICINE; TESTING; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 © The Author(s) 2020