Large Energy Projects and Community Benefits Agreements - Some experience from the UK
Creators
Description
Large projects are often controversial projects, with wide ranging implications for host localities. Energy projects, including windfarms, nuclear power stations, and the more recent cases of fracking and nuclear waste geological disposal, provide particularly high profile cases. In response to concern there has been the emergence of a whole family of new procedures, processes and methods for their assessment and management, including the advent of Community Benefit Agreements (CBAs). This article examines some of the critical issues around the increasing use of such agreements, including: their justification, relationship to the planning process, scale of benefits (which can be very large), types of benefits, and their management and distribution. The focus is on emerging UK practice in relation to energy projects, but there will also be reference to some relevant practice elsewhere—especially in the EU and North America.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.03.009Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.03.009;
- PII
- S0195-9255(16)30309-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review
- Journal Volume
- 65
- Journal Page Range
- p. 12-20
- ISSN
- 0195-9255
- CODEN
- EIARDK
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49051387
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMMUNITIES; NORTH AMERICA; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; UNITED KINGDOM
- Descriptors DEC
- DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EUROPE; MATERIALS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; WASTES; WESTERN EUROPE
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.