Published January 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Proton therapy radiation pneumonitis local dose–response in esophagus cancer patients

  • 1. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (United States)
  • 2. The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (United States)
  • 3. The University of Puerto Rico, San Juan (United States)

Description

Purpose: This study quantifies pulmonary radiation toxicity in patients who received proton therapy for esophagus cancer. Materials/methods: We retrospectively studied 100 esophagus cancer patients treated with proton therapy. The linearity of the enhanced FDG uptake vs. proton dose was evaluated using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Pneumonitis symptoms (RP) were assessed using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAEv4). The interaction of the imaging response with dosimetric parameters and symptoms was evaluated. Results: The RP scores were: 0 grade 4/5, 7 grade 3, 20 grade 2, 37 grade 1, and 36 grade 0. Each dosimetric parameter was significantly higher for the symptomatic group. The AIC winning models were 30 linear, 52 linear quadratic, and 18 linear logarithmic. There was no significant difference in the linear coefficient between models. The slope of the FDG vs. proton dose response was 0.022 for the symptomatic and 0.012 for the asymptomatic (p = 0.014). Combining dosimetric parameters with the slope did not improve the sensitivity or accuracy in identifying symptomatic cases. Conclusions: The proton radiation dose response on FDG PET/CT imaging exhibited a predominantly linear dose response on modeling. Symptomatic patients had a higher dose response slope

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.09.003

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.radonc.2012.09.003;
PII
S0167-8140(12)00378-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Journal Volume
106
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 124-129
ISSN
0167-8140
CODEN
RAONDT

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.