Climate benefits from alternative energy uses of biomass plantations in Uganda
Creators
- 1. JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Leonhardstraße 59, 8010 Graz (Austria)
- 2. The Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, 81 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405 (United States)
- 3. UNIQUE Forestry Consultants Ltd, Schnewlinstraße 10, 79098 Freiburg (Germany)
Description
The establishment of tree plantations in rural areas in Uganda could provide renewable energy to rural communities, while decreasing greenhouse gas emissions from conventional electricity sources and unsustainable forest use. The study evaluates the greenhouse gas benefits that could be produced by biomass based energy systems in Anaka, a rural settlement in the Amuru district in northern Uganda. Two alternative energy uses are explored: a) electricity production through wood gasification and b) traditional fuelwood use. It is estimated that a small-scale wood gasifier could provide electricity for basic community services by planting less than 10 ha of new short rotation coppices (SRCs). The gasification system could save 50–67% of the GHG emissions produced by traditional diesel based electricity generators in terms of CO2-eq. (0.61–0.83 t MWh−1 or 7.1 t y−1 per hectare of SRCs). It was also estimated that traditional use of fuelwood in households is currently unsustainable, i.e. the consumption of wood is higher than the annual growth from natural wood resources in the study area. It is estimated that 0.02–0.06 ha per capita of plantations could render the current consumption of wood sustainable. In this way, the CO2 emissions produced through unsustainable extraction of wood could be avoided (2.0–7.3 t per capita per year or 50–130 t y−1 per hectare of SRCs). -- Highlights: ► We assessed the GHG benefits of short rotation coppices for bioenergy in Uganda. ► The GHG benefits of two energy uses are explored: gasification and fuelwood use. ► The gasifier could save 50–67% of the GHG emissions produced by diesel generators. ► 0.02–0.06 ha per capita of plantations could avoid unsustainable fuelwood use. ► Fuelwood production is more efficient in terms of GHG savings per hectare
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.023Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.023;
- PII
- S0961-9534(12)00153-5;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Journal Volume
- 59
- Journal Page Range
- p. 128-136
- ISSN
- 0961-9534
- CODEN
- BMSBEO
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 45055038
- Subject category
- S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOMASS; BIOMASS PLANTATIONS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATES; COPPICES; CULTIVATION TECHNIQUES; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; EXTRACTION; GASIFICATION; GREENHOUSE GASES; HOUSEHOLDS; RURAL AREAS; TREES; UGANDA; WOOD FUELS
- Descriptors DEC
- AFRICA; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; BIOFUELS; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENERGY SOURCES; FORESTS; FUELS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PLANTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SEPARATION PROCESSES; SOLID FUELS; THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.