Published July 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Impacts of energy subsidy reform on the Malaysian economy and transportation sector

  • 1. Centre for Poverty and Development Studies (CPDS), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
  • 2. Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)

Description

Malaysia is paying a high level of subsidies on the consumption of energy (about 5% of its GDP). Therefore, reforming the energy subsidies, as planned by the government, will have a significant impact on household welfare and energy-intensive sectors, such as the transport sector. This study employs a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to highlight the transmission channels through which the removal of energy subsidies affects the domestic economy. The findings show that the shock increases real GDP and real investment, while decreasing Malaysian total exports and imports. The removal of energy subsidies also decreases the aggregate energy demand, and, consequently, decreases the level of carbon emissions in the Malaysian economy. In addition, households experience significant falls in their consumption and welfare. The transport sector is significantly influenced through an increase in production costs due to an increase in the prices of intermediate inputs. The total output and total exports of the whole transport sector decrease while its imports increase. In addition, the use of all kinds of transport by households decreases significantly. The Malaysian energy subsidy reform, leads to an initial decrease in CO2 emissions and demand for electricity, gas, and petroleum products in the entire transport sector. - Highlights: • Malaysia pays a high level of subsidy on consumption of energy. • The transportation sector in this country is the highest energy consumer among others. • A general equilibrium model used to analyse the effects of energy subsidy reform. • The shock increases real GDP and decreases energy and carbon emission in this sector. • It is not beneficial for the transport sector as decreases the output of this sector

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.035

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.035;
PII
S0301-4215(14)00202-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
70
Journal Page Range
p. 115-125
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.