Published October 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

A three-protein biomarker panel assessed in diagnostic tissue predicts death from prostate cancer for men with localized disease

  • 1. Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010 (Australia)
  • 2. Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004 (Australia)
  • 3. Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, 3800 (Australia)
  • 4. TissuPath Specialist Pathology, Mount Waverley, Victoria, 3149 (Australia)
  • 5. Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010 (Australia)
  • 6. Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004 (Australia)

Description

Only a minority of prostate cancers lead to death. Because no tissue biomarkers of aggressiveness other than Gleason score are available at diagnosis, many nonlethal cancers are treated aggressively. We evaluated whether a panel of biomarkers, associated with a range of disease outcomes in previous studies, could predict death from prostate cancer for men with localized disease. Using a case-only design, subjects were identified from three Australian epidemiological studies. Men who had died of their disease, "cases" (N = 83), were matched to "referents" (N = 232), those who had not died of prostate cancer, using incidence density sampling. Diagnostic tissue was retrieved to assess expression of AZGP1, MUC1, NKX3.1, p53, and PTEN by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry (IHC). Poisson regression was used to estimate mortality rate ratios (MRRs) adjusted for age, Gleason score, and stage and to estimate survival probabilities. Expression of MUC1 and p53 was associated with increased mortality (MRR 2.51, 95% CI 1.14–5.54, P = 0.02 and 3.08, 95% CI 1.41–6.95, P = 0.005, respectively), whereas AZGP1 expression was associated with decreased mortality (MRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20–0.96, P = 0.04). Analyzing all markers under a combined model indicated that the three markers were independent predictors of prostate cancer death and survival. For men with localized disease at diagnosis, assessment of AZGP1, MUC1, and p53 expression in diagnostic tissue by IHC could potentially improve estimates of risk of dying from prostate cancer based only on Gleason score and clinical stage

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.281; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302676

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Cancer medicine
Journal Volume
3
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 1266-1274
ISSN
2045-7634

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46049495
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CHARGES; DEATH; DENSITY; DESIGN; DIAGNOSIS; HAZARDS; MEN; MORTALITY; NEOPLASMS; PANELS; PROSTATE; PROTEINS; SAMPLING
Descriptors DEC
ANIMALS; BODY; DISEASES; GLANDS; MALE GENITALS; MALES; MAMMALS; MAN; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; PRIMATES; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2014 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Notes
PMCID: PMC4302676; PMID: 24909936; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:4302676