Published December 2016
| Version v1
Journal article
On the dispute between Boltzmann and Gibbs entropy
Description
The validity of the concept of negative temperature has been recently challenged by arguing that the Boltzmann entropy (that allows negative temperatures) is inconsistent from a mathematical and statistical point of view, whereas the Gibbs entropy (that does not admit negative temperatures) provides the correct definition for the microcanonical entropy. Here we prove that the Boltzmann entropy is thermodynamically and mathematically consistent. Analytical results on two systems supporting negative temperatures illustrate the scenario we propose. In addition we numerically study a lattice system to show that negative temperature equilibrium states are accessible and obey standard statistical mechanics prediction.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2016.10.017Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.aop.2016.10.017;
- arXiv
- arXiv:1601.01509v2;
- PII
- S0003-4916(16)30234-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Annals of Physics (New York)
- Journal Volume
- 375
- Journal Page Range
- p. 414-434
- ISSN
- 0003-4916
- CODEN
- APNYA6
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48064382
- Subject category
- S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
- Descriptors DEI
- ENTROPY; FREE ENTHALPY; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MECHANICS; THERMODYNAMICS
- Descriptors DEC
- ENERGY; MATHEMATICS; MECHANICS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.