Published June 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Direct neutron spectrum measurement to validate natZr(n,2n) reaction cross-section at 14 MeV

  • 1. Division of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Yamada-oka 2-1, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871 (Japan)
  • 2. Fusion Research and Development Directorate, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki, 319-1195 (Japan)

Description

Lithium zirconate, Li2ZrO3, is known as a candidate blanket material in a fusion reactor. Various neutronics benchmark experiments for zirconium have thus been carried out so far. According to the independent benchmark studies by two parties, the neutron spectrum calculations show fairly large overestimation for most evaluated nuclear data libraries. However, the reason has not yet been made clear up to now. The author's group expects it would be due to a problem of evaluation for the natZr(n,2n) reaction cross-section, because the cross-section measurement is basically not possible with the foil activation method for zirconium isotopes except for 90Zr. In the present study, two neutrons emitted from natZr(n,2n) reaction have been measured directly to investigate the reason for the above overestimation. The measurement was done with our own special technique of detecting angle-correlated neutrons by the coincidence detection technique and the pencil-beam DT neutron source of FNS, JAEA. Angle-correlated energy differential cross-sections for natZr(n,2n) reaction were successfully measured. The obtained total cross-section above the emitted neutron energy of 800 keV was fairly larger than the one evaluated in JENDL-3.3. The total cross-section of natZr(n,2n) reaction was estimated by extrapolating the spectrum down to zero energy taking into account the nuclear temperature. The estimated cross-section value with the nuclear temperature of 1 MeV, which is larger than the one adopted in JENDL-3.3, was in acceptable agreement with JENDL-3.3. It is suggested from the result that the disagreement pointed out in the previous benchmark studies may be due to inappropriate nuclear temperature used in the evaluation. Further investigation of the nuclear temperature employed in the nuclear data evaluation should thus be carried out once again.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.02.053

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.02.053;
PII
S0920-3796(09)00183-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Fusion Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
84
Journal Issue
7-11
Journal Page Range
p. 1376-1379
ISSN
0920-3796
CODEN
FEDEEE

Conference

Title
25. symposium on fusion technology
Acronym
SOFT-25
Dates
15-19 Sep 2008
Place
Rostock (Germany)

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.