Published January 1983 | Version v1
Journal article

Cost-effective mechanical vapor recompression

  • 1. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp., Gore, OK 74435

Description

Explains how increasing natural gas costs provided the incentive to install a mechanical vapor recompression unit that accomodates variations in production rates and provides for plant expansion. The evaporator can concentrate uranyl nitrate solution with much more energy efficiency. Uranyl nitrate solution is purified in the solvent extraction portion of the process, concentrated by evaporation, and then introduced into boildown, where all remaining free water is removed. Benefits of a vapor recompression evaporation system over a single-effect evaporator include not only energy cost savings, but a reduction of about 50% on the plant steam demand and 35% on the heat and pumping load of the plant cooling tower. Material to be evaporated must be thoroughly evaluated to determine that the physical properties are within the economic limits of a vapor recompression system. Available energy sources and other plant needs must also be considered. Concludes that comparison of the installed and operating costs reveals that the multi-effect system cannot compete economically with mechanical vapor recompression, unless the former can also meet unique thermal needs of the plant other than evaporation

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Chem. Eng. Prog.
Journal Volume
79
Journal Issue
1
Series
Chem. Eng. Prog.
Journal Page Range
40-42
ISSN
0009-2495

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
14783794
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
CAPITAL COST; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; EVAPORATORS; OPERATION; URANYL NITRATES
Descriptors DEC
ACTINIDE COMPOUNDS; COST; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; NITRATES; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; URANIUM COMPOUNDS; URANYL COMPOUNDS