Cost-effective mechanical vapor recompression
Description
Explains how increasing natural gas costs provided the incentive to install a mechanical vapor recompression unit that accomodates variations in production rates and provides for plant expansion. The evaporator can concentrate uranyl nitrate solution with much more energy efficiency. Uranyl nitrate solution is purified in the solvent extraction portion of the process, concentrated by evaporation, and then introduced into boildown, where all remaining free water is removed. Benefits of a vapor recompression evaporation system over a single-effect evaporator include not only energy cost savings, but a reduction of about 50% on the plant steam demand and 35% on the heat and pumping load of the plant cooling tower. Material to be evaporated must be thoroughly evaluated to determine that the physical properties are within the economic limits of a vapor recompression system. Available energy sources and other plant needs must also be considered. Concludes that comparison of the installed and operating costs reveals that the multi-effect system cannot compete economically with mechanical vapor recompression, unless the former can also meet unique thermal needs of the plant other than evaporation
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Chem. Eng. Prog.
- Journal Volume
- 79
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Series
- Chem. Eng. Prog.
- Journal Page Range
- 40-42
- ISSN
- 0009-2495
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- United States
- INIS RN
- 14783794
- Subject category
- S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- CAPITAL COST; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; EVAPORATORS; OPERATION; URANYL NITRATES
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDE COMPOUNDS; COST; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; NITRATES; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; URANIUM COMPOUNDS; URANYL COMPOUNDS