Published December 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison of different climate regimes: the impact of broadening participation

  • 1. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, PO BOX 303, 3720 AH Bilthoven (Netherlands)

Description

So-far, most climate mitigation studies look at climate policy strategies in a so-called first-best world, i.e. using the least expensive emission reduction options in all world regions and sectors. To explore the impact of limited participation of countries, we have run a set of scenarios that explore the impact of introducing a carbon tax in OECD, the BRIC countries (Brazil Russia, India and China) and the rest of the world. The results show that carbon taxes can effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, if low greenhouse gas concentration levels are to be achieved, early participation (in some form) of large developing countries is important to increase reduction potential. It should be noted that global carbon taxes (without additional assumptions) lead to relatively high costs in low-income regions. Cap-and-trade regimes have more flexibility to create a comparable distribution of costs amongst countries.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.058

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.058;
PII
S0301-4215(09)00576-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
37
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 5351-5362
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.