Application of House of Quality in evaluation of low rank coal pyrolysis polygeneration technologies
- 1. School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta 53851 (Finland)
- 2. School of Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640 (China)
- 3. Department of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz 90924 (Poland)
Description
Highlights: • House of Quality method was used for assessment of coal pyrolysis polygeneration technologies. • Low rank coal pyrolysis polygeneration processes based on solid heat carrier, moving bed and fluidized bed were evaluated. • Technical and environmental criteria for the assessment of technologies were used. • Low rank coal pyrolysis polygeneration process based on a fluidized bed is the best option. - Abstract: Increasing interest in low rank coal pyrolysis (LRCP) polygeneration has resulted in the development of a number of different technologies and approaches. Evaluation of LRCP processes should include not only conventional efficiency, economic and environmental assessments, but also take into consideration sustainability aspects. As a result of the many complex variables involved, selection of the most suitable LRCP technology becomes a challenging task. This paper applies a House of Quality method in comprehensive evaluation of LRCP. A multi-level evaluation model addressing 19 customer needs and analyzing 10 technical characteristics is developed. Using the evaluation model, the paper evaluates three LRCP technologies, which are based on solid heat carrier, moving bed and fluidized bed concepts, respectively. The results show that the three most important customer needs are level of technical maturity, wastewater emissions, and internal rate of return. The three most important technical characteristics are production costs, investment costs and waste emissions. On the basis of the conducted analysis, it is concluded that the LRCP process utilizing a fluidized bed approach is the optimal alternative studied
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.104Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.104;
- PII
- S0196-8904(15)00330-1;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Journal Volume
- 99
- Journal Page Range
- p. 231-241
- ISSN
- 0196-8904
- CODEN
- ECMADL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47025881
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- COAL; COST; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FLUIDIZED BEDS; HEAT; INVESTMENT; PYROLYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; WASTE WATER
- Descriptors DEC
- CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; DECOMPOSITION; ECONOMICS; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCES; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; LIQUID WASTES; MATERIALS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; WASTES; WATER
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.